These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32568140)

  • 1. A comparative study between zirconia and titanium abutments on the stress distribution in parafunctional loading: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Sivrikaya EC; Guler MS; Bekci ML
    Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(6):603-613. PubMed ID: 32568140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis.
    Gökçimen G; Durkan R; Deste Gökay G; Oyar P
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 37434476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior implants associated with titanium and zirconia abutments and monotype zirconia implants.
    Brandão de Holanda KA; Armini Caldas R; Amaral M; da Silva Concilio LR; Pino Vitti R
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Feb; 65(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 32938877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stress distribution and microgap formation in angulated zirconia abutments with a titanium base in narrow diameter implants: A 3D finite element analysis.
    Zhang Y; Yu P; Yu H
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Jul; 38(7):e3610. PubMed ID: 35490303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative finite element analysis of mandibular posterior single zirconia and titanium implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Choi SM; Choi H; Lee DH; Hong MH
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 13(6):396-407. PubMed ID: 35003555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.
    Tretto PHW; Dos Santos MBF; Spazzin AO; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):372-383. PubMed ID: 32116034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of the Type of Angled Abutment for Anterior Maxillary Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Korkmaz IH; Kul E
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Oct; 31(8):689-696. PubMed ID: 34859942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Different Customized Abutment Types on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported Single Crown: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Pumnil S; Rungsiyakull P; Rungsiyakull C; Elsaka S
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):e2-e11. PubMed ID: 35505638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Zhang WT; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Chen YF; Ding YD; Yang F; Wang LH
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 36180871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in Zirconia and Titanium Dental Implants.
    Lopez CAV; Vasco MAA; Ruales E; Bedoya KA; Benfatti CM; Bezzon OL; Deliberador TM
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Dec; 44(6):409-415. PubMed ID: 29763360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of prosthetic abutment material on the stress distribution in a maxillary single implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
    Peixoto HE; Bordin D; Del Bel Cury AA; da Silva WJ; Faot F
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Aug; 65():90-6. PubMed ID: 27157731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative analysis of stress distribution around CFR‑PEEK implants and titanium implants with different prosthetic crowns: A finite element analysis.
    Tamrakar SK; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R; Rao S
    Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(3):359-367. PubMed ID: 34597479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fatigue fracture resistance of titanium and chairside CAD-CAM zirconia implant abutments supporting zirconia crowns: An in vitro comparative and finite element analysis study.
    Giner S; Bartolomé JF; Gomez-Cogolludo P; Castellote C; Pradíes G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):503.e1-503.e9. PubMed ID: 33243472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of zirconia abutment angulation on stress distribution in the abutment and the bone around implant: a finite element study].
    Yang YZ; Tian XH; Zhou YM
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Aug; 24(4):447-50. PubMed ID: 26383569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.