These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32568203)

  • 1. Realizing the Potential of Robotics for Aged Care Through Co-Creation.
    Robillard JM; Kabacińska K
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2020; 76(2):461-466. PubMed ID: 32568203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical challenges in the use of social service robots for elderly people.
    Körtner T
    Z Gerontol Geriatr; 2016 Jun; 49(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 27220734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Ethics of Socially Assistive Robots in Aged Care. A Focus Group Study With Older Adults in Flanders, Belgium.
    Vandemeulebroucke T; Dierckx de Casterlé B; Welbergen L; Massart M; Gastmans C
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2020 Oct; 75(9):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 31131848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethics of socially assistive robots in aged-care settings: a socio-historical contextualisation.
    Vandemeulebroucke T; Dierckx de Casterlé B; Gastmans C
    J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 31818967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical Design and Use of Robotic Care of the Elderly.
    Johnston C
    J Bioeth Inq; 2022 Mar; 19(1):11-14. PubMed ID: 35312965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technological risks and ethical implications of using robots in long-term care.
    Hung L; Mann J; Perry J; Berndt A; Wong J
    J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng; 2022; 9():20556683221106917. PubMed ID: 35733613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care.
    Abdi J; Al-Hindawi A; Ng T; Vizcaychipi MP
    BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e018815. PubMed ID: 29440212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The adoption of socially assistive robots for long-term care: During COVID-19 and in a post-pandemic society.
    Getson C; Nejat G
    Healthc Manage Forum; 2022 Sep; 35(5):301-309. PubMed ID: 35714374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic Nudges: The Ethics of Engineering a More Socially Just Human Being.
    Borenstein J; Arkin R
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 25736832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Views on Using Social Robots in Professional Caregiving: Content Analysis of a Scenario Method Workshop.
    Busse TS; Kernebeck S; Nef L; Rebacz P; Kickbusch I; Ehlers JP
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Nov; 23(11):e20046. PubMed ID: 34757318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical perceptions towards real-world use of companion robots with older people and people with dementia: survey opinions among younger adults.
    Bradwell HL; Winnington R; Thill S; Jones RB
    BMC Geriatr; 2020 Jul; 20(1):244. PubMed ID: 32664904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Robotic Coach Architecture for Elder Care (ROCARE) Based on Multi-User Engagement Models.
    Fan J; Bian D; Zheng Z; Beuscher L; Newhouse PA; Mion LC; Sarkar N
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Aug; 25(8):1153-1163. PubMed ID: 28113672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interactive robots for health in Europe: Technology readiness and adoption potential.
    Östlund B; Malvezzi M; Frennert S; Funk M; Gonzalez-Vargas J; Baur K; Alimisis D; Thorsteinsson F; Alonso-Cepeda A; Fau G; Haufe F; Di Pardo M; Moreno JC
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():979225. PubMed ID: 36992891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review.
    Papadopoulos I; Koulouglioti C; Lazzarino R; Ali S
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e033096. PubMed ID: 31924639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The coming revolution in personal care robotics: what does it mean for nurses?
    Sharts-Hopko NC
    Nurs Adm Q; 2014; 38(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 24317027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders.
    Wangmo T; Lipps M; Kressig RW; Ienca M
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 31856798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.
    Vandemeulebroucke T; de Casterlé BD; Gastmans C
    Aging Ment Health; 2018 Feb; 22(2):149-167. PubMed ID: 28282732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The eldercare factory.
    Sharkey N; Sharkey A
    Gerontology; 2012; 58(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 21952502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Robotic systems for care at home: A scoping review].
    Buhtz C; Paulicke D; Hirt J; Schwarz K; Stoevesandt D; Meyer G; Jahn P
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Nov; 137-138():1-8. PubMed ID: 30420249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assistive robots for socialization in elderly people: results pertaining to the needs of the users.
    D'Onofrio G; Fiorini L; Hoshino H; Matsumori A; Okabe Y; Tsukamoto M; Limosani R; Vitanza A; Greco F; Greco A; Giuliani F; Cavallo F; Sancarlo D
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2019 Sep; 31(9):1313-1329. PubMed ID: 30560429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.