454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32568896)
1. What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Differences in SF-36 Scores in Patients with Orthopaedic Oncologic Conditions?
Ogura K; Yakoub MA; Christ AB; Fujiwara T; Nikolic Z; Boland PJ; Healey JH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2148-2158. PubMed ID: 32568896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions?
Hung M; Saltzman CL; Kendall R; Bounsanga J; Voss MW; Lawrence B; Spiker R; Brodke D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2027-2036. PubMed ID: 30179950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review.
Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Christopher ZK; Gerhart CRB; Clarke HD; Spangehl MJ; Bingham JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 481(4):702-714. PubMed ID: 36398323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative Short Form Health Survey Score Is Predictive of Return to Play and Minimal Clinically Important Difference at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Nwachukwu BU; Chang B; Voleti PB; Berkanish P; Cohn MR; Altchek DW; Allen AA; Williams RJ
Am J Sports Med; 2017 Oct; 45(12):2784-2790. PubMed ID: 28727937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum Clinically Important Difference in SF-36 Scores for Use in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.
Badhiwala JH; Witiw CD; Nassiri F; Akbar MA; Jaja B; Wilson JR; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(21):E1260-E1266. PubMed ID: 29652783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimum clinically important difference of the health-related quality of life scales in adult spinal deformity calculated by latent class analysis: is it appropriate to use the same values for surgical and nonsurgical patients?
Yuksel S; Ayhan S; Nabiyev V; Domingo-Sabat M; Vila-Casademunt A; Obeid I; Perez-Grueso FS; Acaroglu E;
Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 30010046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What Is the Clinical Benefit of Common Orthopaedic Procedures as Assessed by the PROMIS Versus Other Validated Outcomes Tools?
Karhade AV; Bernstein DN; Desai V; Bedair HS; O'Donnell EA; Tanaka MJ; Bono CM; Harris MB; Schwab JH; Tobert DG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Sep; 480(9):1672-1681. PubMed ID: 35543521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimal clinically important difference in patients who underwent decompression alone for lumbar degenerative disease.
Nakarai H; Kato S; Kawamura N; Higashikawa A; Takeshita Y; Fukushima M; Ono T; Hara N; Azuma S; Tanaka S; Oshima Y
Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):549-560. PubMed ID: 34699996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimum Clinically Important Differences of the Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory and Other Dysphagia Measurements in Patients Undergoing ACDF.
Okano I; Ortiz Miller C; Salzmann SN; Hoshino Y; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 478(10):2309-2320. PubMed ID: 32282534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.
Rojanasopondist P; Galea VP; Connelly JW; Matuszak SJ; Rolfson O; Bragdon CR; Malchau H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1301-1312. PubMed ID: 31136425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Be Used to Predict Meaningful Improvement in Function After TKA?
Berliner JL; Brodke DJ; Chan V; SooHoo NF; Bozic KJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):149-157. PubMed ID: 26956248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the "Minimal Clinically Important Difference" (MCID) of the KOOS, KSS and SF-12 scores after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.
Jacquet C; Pioger C; Khakha R; Steltzlen C; Kley K; Pujol N; Ollivier M
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Mar; 29(3):820-826. PubMed ID: 32342141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What Are the Minimal and Substantial Improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR Versions After Total Joint Replacement?
Lyman S; Lee YY; McLawhorn AS; Islam W; MacLean CH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2432-2441. PubMed ID: 30179951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review.
Deckey DG; Verhey JT; Gerhart CRB; Christopher ZK; Spangehl MJ; Clarke HD; Bingham JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2023 Jan; 481(1):63-80. PubMed ID: 36200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimal clinically important differences in SF-36 global score: Current value in orthopedic oncology.
Ogura K; Bartelstein MK; Yakoub MA; Nikolic Z; Boland PJ; Healey JH
J Orthop Res; 2021 Oct; 39(10):2116-2123. PubMed ID: 33617087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
