These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32569306)

  • 1. Concreteness/abstractness ratings for two-character Chinese words in MELD-SCH.
    Xu X; Li J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0232133. PubMed ID: 32569306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Valence and arousal ratings for 11,310 simplified Chinese words.
    Xu X; Li J; Chen H
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Feb; 54(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 34100200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Familiarity ratings for 24,325 simplified Chinese words.
    Su Y; Li Y; Li H
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1496-1509. PubMed ID: 35668341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hong Kong Chinese character psycholinguistic norms: ratings of 4376 single Chinese characters on semantic radical transparency, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, imageability, and concreteness.
    Su IF; Yum YN; Lau DK
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2989-3008. PubMed ID: 36002627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How well imageability, concreteness, perceptual strength, and action strength predict recognition memory, lexical decision, and reading aloud performance.
    Khanna MM; Cortese MJ
    Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):622-636. PubMed ID: 33971794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Norms of valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, and context availability for 1,100 Chinese words.
    Yao Z; Wu J; Zhang Y; Wang Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1374-1385. PubMed ID: 27553483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Valence, arousal, familiarity, concreteness, and imageability ratings for 292 two-character Chinese nouns in Cantonese speakers in Hong Kong.
    Yee LT
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174569. PubMed ID: 28346514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond the abstract-concrete dichotomy: mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words.
    Della Rosa PA; Catricalà E; Vigliocco G; Cappa SF
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Nov; 42(4):1042-8. PubMed ID: 21139171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Croatian psycholinguistic database: Estimates for 6000 nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs.
    Peti-Stantić A; Anđel M; Gnjidić V; Keresteš G; Ljubešić N; Masnikosa I; Tonković M; Tušek J; Willer-Gold J; Stanojević MM
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Aug; 53(4):1799-1816. PubMed ID: 33904142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
    Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Database of Chinese-English Bilingual Speakers: Ratings of the Age of Acquisition and Familiarity.
    Wang J; Chen B
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():554785. PubMed ID: 33071876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decoding the essence of two-character Chinese words: Unveiling valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, and imageability through word norming.
    Chan YL; Tse CS
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38750390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CONcreTEXT norms: Concreteness ratings for Italian and English words in context.
    Montefinese M; Gregori L; Ravelli AA; Varvara R; Radicioni DP
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0293031. PubMed ID: 37862357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic similarity and associated abstractness norms for 630 French word pairs.
    Lakhzoum D; Izaute M; Ferrand L
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Jun; 53(3):1166-1178. PubMed ID: 33006067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.
    Bonin P; Méot A; Bugaiska A
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2366-2387. PubMed ID: 29435912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ERP megastudy of Chinese word recognition.
    Tsang YK; Zou Y
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Nov; 59(11):e14111. PubMed ID: 35609148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relations Between L2 Proficiency and L1 Lexical Property Evaluations.
    Altın E; Okur N; Yalçın E; Eraçıkbaş AF; Aktan-Erciyes A
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():820702. PubMed ID: 35369194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concreteness ratings for 62,000 English multiword expressions.
    Muraki EJ; Abdalla S; Brysbaert M; Pexman PM
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Aug; 55(5):2522-2531. PubMed ID: 35867207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-Arbitrariness in Mapping Word Form to Meaning: Cross-Linguistic Formal Markers of Word Concreteness.
    Reilly J; Hung J; Westbury C
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41(4):1071-1089. PubMed ID: 26988464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chinese translation norms for 1,429 English words.
    Wen Y; van Heuven WJB
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Jun; 49(3):1006-1019. PubMed ID: 27325164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.