143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3257111)
1. Stage IB cervical carcinoma: comparison of clinical, MR, and pathologic staging.
Rubens D; Thornbury JR; Angel C; Stoler MH; Weiss SL; Lerner RM; Beecham J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Jan; 150(1):135-8. PubMed ID: 3257111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (stage IB-IIB): evaluation using magnetic resonance].
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni L; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 2236692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix--3 years' experience].
Bosković V; Glisić A; Petković S
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1998; 126(5-6):183-7. PubMed ID: 9863378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (Stage IB-IIB). Comparison of CT and MR for the assessment of the parametrium].
Sironi S; Zanello A; Rodighiero MG; Vanzulli A; Taccagni GL; Belloni C; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 2057595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT and ultra low field (0.02 T) MR imaging of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Varpula M; Kilholma P; Klemi P
Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 8011386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings.
Kim SH; Choi BI; Lee HP; Kang SB; Choi YM; Han MC; Kim CW
Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 2315503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging.
Togashi K; Nishimura K; Sagoh T; Minami S; Noma S; Fujisawa I; Nakano Y; Konishi J; Ozasa H; Konishi I
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 2928532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.
Ho CM; Chien TY; Jeng CM; Tsang YM; Shih BY; Chang SC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 91(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 1362678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
Cobby M; Browning J; Jones A; Whipp E; Goddard P
Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):673-9. PubMed ID: 2205326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer.
Mezrich R
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. More accurate definition of clinical target volume based on the measurement of microscopic extensions of the primary tumor toward the uterus body in international federation of gynecology and obstetrics Ib-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
Xie WJ; Wu X; Xue RL; Lin XY; Kidd EA; Yan SM; Zhang YH; Zhai TT; Lu JY; Wu LL; Zhang H; Huang HH; Chen ZJ; Li DR; Xie LX
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):206-12. PubMed ID: 25442332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement.
Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni GL; DelMaschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Apr; 156(4):753-6. PubMed ID: 2003441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.
Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM
Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed tomography in invasive carcinoma of the cervix: an appraisal.
Villasanta U; Whitley NO; Haney PJ; Brenner D
Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):218-24. PubMed ID: 6866364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association between developmental steps in the organogenesis of the uterine cervix and locoregional progression of cervical cancer: a prospective clinicopathological analysis.
Höckel M; Hentschel B; Horn LC
Lancet Oncol; 2014 Apr; 15(4):445-56. PubMed ID: 24656439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Kim MJ; Chung JJ; Lee YH; Lee JT; Yoo HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1215-21. PubMed ID: 9129414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Stage I and II cervical carcinoma. Study with magnetic resonance and transrectal echography].
Tipaldi L; Squillaci E; Cecconi L; Lombardi A; Marsella A; Vincenzoni C; Crecco M; Squillaci S
Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):666-70. PubMed ID: 2057594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in the demographics and perioperative care of stage IA(2)/IB(1) cervical cancer over the past 16 years.
Covens A; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; DePetrillo AD; Lickrish G; Colgan T; Chapman W; Shaw P
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 May; 81(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11330939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.
deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
