BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32571371)

  • 21. Diagnostic value of using 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zou Y; Tong J; Leng H; Jiang J; Pan M; Chen Z
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jun; 8(25):41518-41528. PubMed ID: 28514747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Direct comparison of diagnostic accuracies of F-18 FDG PET and MRI for detection of bone marrow involvement in lymphoma patients; A meta-analysis.
    Kim K; Kim SJ
    Leuk Res; 2020 Dec; 99():106475. PubMed ID: 33189988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT with bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastasis: a meta-analysis.
    Cheng X; Li Y; Xu Z; Bao L; Li D; Wang J
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):779-87. PubMed ID: 21712464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnostic value of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.
    Wu Y; Li P; Zhang H; Shi Y; Wu H; Zhang J; Qian Y; Li C; Yang J
    Int J Cancer; 2013 Jan; 132(2):E37-47. PubMed ID: 22890912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic test accuracy of
    Seol HY; Kim YS; Kim SJ
    Clin Radiol; 2021 Nov; 76(11):863.e19-863.e25. PubMed ID: 34261597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET and PET/CT in the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign pleural lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Treglia G; Sadeghi R; Annunziata S; Lococo F; Cafarotti S; Bertagna F; Prior JO; Ceriani L; Giovanella L
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 24331260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT for prediction of KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1703-1711. PubMed ID: 30603881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnostic performance of
    Treglia G; Pascale M; Lazzeri E; van der Bruggen W; Delgado Bolton RC; Glaudemans AWJM
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1287-1301. PubMed ID: 31729539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT for predicting malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kim SJ; Lee SW
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 33(3):576-582. PubMed ID: 28994187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diffusion-weighted MRI versus FDG-PET/CT for diagnosing pancreatic cancer: an indirect comparison meta-analysis.
    Que R; Chen Y; Tao Z; Ge B; Li M; Fu Z; Li Y
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Nov; 61(11):1473-1483. PubMed ID: 32148066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for large vessel vasculitis : A meta-analysis.
    Lee YH; Choi SJ; Ji JD; Song GG
    Z Rheumatol; 2016 Nov; 75(9):924-931. PubMed ID: 26704559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Whole-Body
    Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus CV; Fragomeni RS; Rowe SP; Javadi MS; Solnes LB
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Jul; 58(7):1031-1036. PubMed ID: 27980049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diagnostic test accuracies of F-18 FDG PET/CT for prediction of microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
    Kim K; Kim SJ
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Nov; 79():251-258. PubMed ID: 34157501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A systematic review and meta-analysis of
    Kim SJ; Lee SW; Jeong SY; Pak K; Kim K
    J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):307-313. PubMed ID: 30922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging and restaging primary bone lymphoma.
    Liu Y
    Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Apr; 38(4):319-324. PubMed ID: 28225435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correlation Between
    Yu P; Lei J; Xu B; Wang R; Shen Z; Tian J
    Acad Radiol; 2020 May; 27(5):682-688. PubMed ID: 31311773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37.
    Lamarca A; Barriuso J; Chander A; McNamara MG; Hubner RA; ÓReilly D; Manoharan P; Valle JW
    J Hepatol; 2019 Jul; 71(1):115-129. PubMed ID: 30797051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules: A meta-analysis.
    Li ZZ; Huang YL; Song HJ; Wang YJ; Huang Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Mar; 97(12):e0130. PubMed ID: 29561412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Machado Medeiros T; Altmayer S; Watte G; Zanon M; Basso Dias A; Henz Concatto N; Hoefel Paes J; Mattiello R; de Souza Santos F; Mohammed TL; Verma N; Hochhegger B
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3641-3649. PubMed ID: 32125513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic test accuracies of F-18 FDG PET for characterisation of cardiac masses compared to conventional imaging techniques: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kim K; Ko WS; Kim SJ
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 95(1135):20210263. PubMed ID: 35612548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.