BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32571379)

  • 1. Radiobiological model-based approach to determine the potential of dose-escalated robust intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy in reducing gastrointestinal toxicity in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer of the head.
    Raturi VP; Hojo H; Hotta K; Baba H; Takahashi R; Rachi T; Nakamura N; Zenda S; Motegi A; Tachibana H; Ariji T; Motegi K; Nakamura M; Okumura M; Hirano Y; Akimoto T
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jun; 15(1):157. PubMed ID: 32571379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Probability of normal tissue complications for hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicity in postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies using intensity-modulated proton therapy with robust optimization.
    Yoshimura T; Yamada R; Kinoshita R; Matsuura T; Kanehira T; Tamura H; Nishioka K; Yasuda K; Taguchi H; Katoh N; Kobashi K; Hashimoto T; Aoyama H
    J Radiat Res; 2024 May; 65(3):369-378. PubMed ID: 38499489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intensity-modulated proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy using a fixed-beam system for locally advanced lung cancer: dosimetric comparison with x-ray radiotherapy and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) evaluation.
    Ming X; Mao J; Ma N; Chen J; Wang W; Sheng Y; Wu K
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jan; 69(1):. PubMed ID: 38064747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose-Volume and Radiobiological Model-Based Comparative Evaluation of the Gastrointestinal Toxicity Risk of Photon and Proton Irradiation Plans in Localized Pancreatic Cancer Without Distant Metastasis.
    Raturi VP; Tochinai T; Hojo H; Rachi T; Hotta K; Nakamura N; Zenda S; Motegi A; Ariji T; Hirano Y; Baba H; Ohyoshi H; Nakamura M; Okumura M; Bei Y; Akimoto T
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():517061. PubMed ID: 33194580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetric comparison between carbon, proton and photon radiation for renal retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma recurrence or metastasis after radical nephrectomy.
    Ming X; Wang W; Shahnazi K; Sun J; Zhang Q; Li P; Hong Z; Sheng Y
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2022; 98(2):183-190. PubMed ID: 34802361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensity modulated proton therapy compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy in the irradiation of young female patients with hodgkin's lymphoma. Assessment of risk of toxicity and secondary cancer induction.
    Scorsetti M; Cozzi L; Navarria P; Fogliata A; Rossi A; Franceschini D; De Rose F; Franzese C; Carlo-Stella C; Santoro A
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):12. PubMed ID: 31931861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of intensity modulated proton therapy and RapidArc planning for high-risk prostate cancer with seminal vesicles.
    Rana S; Cheng C; Zhao L; Park S; Larson G; Vargas C; Dunn M; Zheng Y
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2017 Mar; 64(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 27741379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
    de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normal tissue complication probability modeling to guide individual treatment planning in pediatric cranial proton and photon radiotherapy.
    Dell'Oro M; Wilson P; Short M; Hua CH; Merchant TE; Bezak E
    Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 49(1):742-755. PubMed ID: 34796509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NTCP modeling analysis of acute hematologic toxicity in whole pelvic radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies - A dosimetric comparison of IMRT and spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT).
    Yoshimura T; Kinoshita R; Onodera S; Toramatsu C; Suzuki R; Ito YM; Takao S; Matsuura T; Matsuzaki Y; Umegaki K; Shirato H; Shimizu S
    Phys Med; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1095-102. PubMed ID: 27567089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetric advantages of intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer compared with intensity-modulated radiation: A case-matched control analysis.
    Holliday EB; Kocak-Uzel E; Feng L; Thaker NG; Blanchard P; Rosenthal DI; Gunn GB; Garden AS; Frank SJ
    Med Dosim; 2016; 41(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 27158021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Potential skin morbidity reduction with intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer with nodal involvement.
    Fellin F; Iacco M; D'Avino V; Tommasino F; Farace P; Palma G; Conson M; Giacomelli I; Zucchetti C; Falcinelli L; Amichetti M; Aristei C; Cella L
    Acta Oncol; 2019 Jun; 58(6):934-942. PubMed ID: 30938217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of different treatment planning approaches for intensity-modulated proton therapy with simultaneous integrated boost for pancreatic cancer.
    Stefanowicz S; Stützer K; Zschaeck S; Jakobi A; Troost EGC
    Radiat Oncol; 2018 Nov; 13(1):228. PubMed ID: 30466468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Hung HM; Chan OCM; Mak CH; Hung WM; Ng WT; Lee MCH
    Med Dosim; 2022 Spring; 47(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 34470708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of plan quality and robustness of IMPT and helical IMRT for cervical cancer.
    Shang H; Pu Y; Wang W; Dai Z; Jin F
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Feb; 15(1):34. PubMed ID: 32054496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study.
    Liu G; Li X; Qin A; Zheng W; Yan D; Zhang S; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Ding X
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 32000817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison.
    Marnitz S; Wlodarczyk W; Neumann O; Koehler C; Weihrauch M; Budach V; Cozzi L
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():91. PubMed ID: 25896675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjuvant intensity-modulated proton therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. A comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and a spot size variation assessment.
    Lorentini S; Amichetti M; Spiazzi L; Tonoli S; Magrini SM; Fellin F; Schwarz M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2012 Mar; 188(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 22318326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Target tailoring and proton beam therapy to reduce small bowel dose in cervical cancer radiotherapy : A comparison of benefits.
    de Boer P; van de Schoot AJAJ; Westerveld H; Smit M; Buist MR; Bel A; Rasch CRN; Stalpers LJA
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Mar; 194(3):255-263. PubMed ID: 29101415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose comparison of robustly optimized intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) vs IMRT and VMAT photon plans for testicular seminoma.
    Rønde HS; Kronborg C; Høyer M; Hansen J; Bak ME; Agergaard SN; Als AB; Agerbæk M; Lauritsen J; Meidahl Petersen P; Dysager L; Kallehauge JF
    Acta Oncol; 2023 Oct; 62(10):1222-1229. PubMed ID: 37683054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.