161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32571714)
1. Trends of robotic-assisted surgery for thyroid, colorectal, stomach and hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer: 10 year Korea trend investigation.
An L; Hwang KS; Park SH; Kim YN; Baek SJ; Park S; Hyung WJ; Chung WY; Kim SH;
Asian J Surg; 2021 Jan; 44(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 32571714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in the Use of Laparoscopy and Robotics for Colorectal Cancer in Florida.
Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Naessens J; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Jul; 29(7):926-933. PubMed ID: 31094645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic rectal surgery in Korea: Analysis of a nationwide registry.
Baek SJ; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH; Park S;
Int J Med Robot; 2018 Jun; 14(3):e1896. PubMed ID: 29468811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolving application of minimally invasive cancer operations at a tertiary cancer center.
Selby LV; DeMatteo RP; Tholey RM; Jarnagin WR; Garcia-Aguilar J; Strombom PD; Allen PJ; Kingham TP; Weiser MR; Brennan MF; Strong VE
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(4):365-370. PubMed ID: 28299807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends and outcomes of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the USA: maintaining perioperative and oncologic safety.
Konstantinidis IT; Ituarte P; Woo Y; Warner SG; Melstrom K; Kim J; Singh G; Lee B; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4932-4942. PubMed ID: 31820161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of trends in operative approach and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery.
Addae JK; Gani F; Fang SY; Wick EC; Althumairi AA; Efron JE; Canner JK; Euhus DM; Schneider EB
J Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 208():111-120. PubMed ID: 27993198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery.
Hollis RH; Cannon JA; Singletary BA; Korb ML; Hawn MT; Heslin MJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):850-856. PubMed ID: 27398733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer.
Zhu XL; Yan PJ; Yao L; Liu R; Wu DW; Du BB; Yang KH; Guo TK; Yang XF
Surg Innov; 2019 Feb; 26(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 30191755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Cleary RK; Mullard AJ; Ferraro J; Regenbogen SE
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 28916895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Considerations regarding pain management and anesthesiological aspects in pediatric patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery: robotic vs laparoscopic-thoracoscopic approach.
Molinaro F; Krasniqi P; Scolletta S; Giuntini L; Navarra C; Puzzutiello R; Fusi G; Angotti R; Bindi E; Zanaboni C; Messina M; Mattioli G
J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):423-430. PubMed ID: 31342309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample.
Stewart CL; Ituarte PHG; Melstrom KA; Warner SG; Melstrom LG; Lai LL; Fong Y; Woo Y
Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2591-2601. PubMed ID: 30357525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative effectiveness of human scope assistant versus robotic scope holder in laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.
Ohmura Y; Suzuki H; Kotani K; Teramoto A
Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2206-2216. PubMed ID: 30334160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and efficacy of synchronous robotic surgery for colorectal cancer with liver metastases.
Dwyer RH; Scheidt MJ; Marshall JS; Tsoraides SS
J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29704203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adoption of Robotic Technology for Treating Colorectal Cancer.
Schootman M; Hendren S; Ratnapradipa K; Stringer L; Davidson NO
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 27749475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lower rate of conversion using robotic-assisted surgery compared to laparoscopy in completion total gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer.
Alhossaini RM; Altamran AA; Cho M; Roh CK; Seo WJ; Choi S; Son T; Kim HI; Hyung WJ
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):847-852. PubMed ID: 31139994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.
Altieri MS; Yang J; Telem DA; Zhu J; Halbert C; Talamini M; Pryor AD
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):925-33. PubMed ID: 26139489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy and Safety of Robotic Procedures Performed Using the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System at a Single Institute in Korea: Experience with 10000 Cases.
Koh DH; Jang WS; Park JW; Ham WS; Han WK; Rha KH; Choi YD
Yonsei Med J; 2018 Oct; 59(8):975-981. PubMed ID: 30187705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
