These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32571763)
1. Readability of online dengue materials: The need for accessible information as part of infectious disease prevention and control efforts. Meleo-Erwin Z; Basch CH; Fera J; Garcia P Infect Dis Health; 2020 Nov; 25(4):277-282. PubMed ID: 32571763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials. Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Readability of online material related to skin cancer. Basch CH; Fera J; Ethan D; Garcia P; Perin D; Basch CE Public Health; 2018 Oct; 163():137-140. PubMed ID: 30149263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Voice Disorders. Dueppen AJ; Bellon-Harn ML; Radhakrishnan N; Manchaiah V J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 29254598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preeclampsia information on the internet: An application of five readability tests. Samuel L; Fera J; Basch CH Pregnancy Hypertens; 2022 Dec; 30():110-112. PubMed ID: 36155112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias. Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative readability analysis of websites providing information on traumatic brain injury and epilepsy: A need for clear communication. Correa DJ; Milano L; Kwon CS; Jetté N; Dlugos D; Harte-Hargrove L; Pugh MJ; Smith JK; Moshé SL Epilepsia; 2020 Mar; 61(3):528-538. PubMed ID: 32096225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Readability of online patient-based information on bariatric surgery. Meleo-Erwin Z; Basch C; Fera J; Ethan D; Garcia P Health Promot Perspect; 2019; 9(2):156-160. PubMed ID: 31249804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants. Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Readability of influenza information online: Implications for consumer health. Basch CH; Fera J; Garcia P Am J Infect Control; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1298-1301. PubMed ID: 31253552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Examining the Reading Level of Internet Medical Information for Common Internal Medicine Diagnoses. Hutchinson N; Baird GL; Garg M Am J Med; 2016 Jun; 129(6):637-9. PubMed ID: 26829438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Readability of Prostate Cancer Information Online: A Cross-Sectional Study. Basch CH; Ethan D; MacLean SA; Fera J; Garcia P; Basch CE Am J Mens Health; 2018 Sep; 12(5):1665-1669. PubMed ID: 29888641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level. Eltorai AE; Sharma P; Wang J; Daniels AH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1181-6. PubMed ID: 25475715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Readability evaluation of Internet-based patient education materials related to the anesthesiology field. De Oliveira GS; Jung M; Mccaffery KJ; McCarthy RJ; Wolf MS J Clin Anesth; 2015 Aug; 27(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 25912728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An assessment of the readability of online material related to fluoride. Basch CH; Ethan D; Cadorett V; Kollia B; Clark A J Prev Interv Community; 2019; 47(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 30806197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cauda equina syndrome: assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet. O'Neill SC; Baker JF; Fitzgerald C; Fleming C; Rowan F; Byrne D; Synnott K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):E645-9. PubMed ID: 24583736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Readability of Online Health Information: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review. Daraz L; Morrow AS; Ponce OJ; Farah W; Katabi A; Majzoub A; Seisa MO; Benkhadra R; Alsawas M; Larry P; Murad MH Am J Med Qual; 2018; 33(5):487-492. PubMed ID: 29345143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients. Prabhu AV; Kim C; Crihalmeanu T; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; DeFrances MC; Trejo Bittar HE Hum Pathol; 2017 Jul; 65():15-20. PubMed ID: 28504209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]