These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32571892)

  • 1. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China.
    Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: Ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028).
    Paik ES; Lim MC; Kim MH; Kim YH; Song ES; Seong SJ; Suh DH; Lee JM; Lee C; Choi CH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):547-553. PubMed ID: 31272738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
    Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: oncologic outcomes based on tumor diameter.
    He J; Hao M; Liu P; Liu Z; Lang J; Bin X; Chen C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 32699022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
    Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 （LVSI
    Chen CL; Kang S; Chen BL; Yang Y; Guo JX; Hao M; Wang WL; Ji M; Sun LX; Wang L; Liang WT; Wang SG; Li WL; Fan HJ; Liu P; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):589-599. PubMed ID: 32957747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
    Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].
    Xu YP; Wang ZQ; Liang XD; Wang Y; Wang JL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 32957749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.
    Uppal S; Gehrig PA; Peng K; Bixel KL; Matsuo K; Vetter MH; Davidson BA; Cisa MP; Lees BF; Brunette LL; Tucker K; Stuart Staley A; Gotlieb WH; Holloway RW; Essel KG; Holman LL; Goldfeld E; Olawaiye A; Rose SL
    J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 38(10):1030-1040. PubMed ID: 32031867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of long-term survival of total abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Korean multicenter, retrospective analysis.
    Kwon BS; Roh HJ; Lee S; Yang J; Song YJ; Lee SH; Kim KH; Suh DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):642-648. PubMed ID: 33041070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary conization overcomes the risk of developing local recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
    Bogani G; Ditto A; Chiappa V; Pinelli C; Sonetto C; Raspagliesi F
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Oct; 151(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 32511745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
    Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
    Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.