147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32574087)
1. Evaluation of the stage classification of anal cancer by the TNM 8th version versus the TNM 7th version.
Dahl O; Myklebust MP; Dale JE; Leon O; Serup-Hansen E; Jakobsen A; Pfeiffer P; Løes IM; Pfeffer F; Spindler KG; Guren MG; Glimelius B; Johnsson A
Acta Oncol; 2020 Sep; 59(9):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 32574087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the external validity of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system for anal carcinoma.
Oweira H; Giryes A; Mannhart M; Decker M; Schlumpf R; Abdel-Rahman O
Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 May; 34(5):923-929. PubMed ID: 29448859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) changes for patients with stage III gastric cancer: survival analysis of a large series from a Specialized Eastern Center.
Lu J; Zheng CH; Cao LL; Ling SW; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Chen QY; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang CM
Cancer Med; 2017 Oct; 6(10):2179-2187. PubMed ID: 28913982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC staging system in terms of predicting recurrence and survival in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Nam SH; Bae MR; Roh JL; Gong G; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Oral Oncol; 2018 Dec; 87():158-164. PubMed ID: 30527232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The applicability of new TNM classification for humanpapilloma virus-related oropharyngeal cancer in the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system in Japan: A single-centre study.
Sano D; Yabuki K; Arai Y; Tanabe T; Chiba Y; Nishimura G; Takahashi H; Yamanaka S; Oridate N
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Jun; 45(3):558-565. PubMed ID: 28760331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the 8th TNM classification for small-cell lung cancer in a retrospective material from Sweden.
Tendler S; Grozman V; Lewensohn R; Tsakonas G; Viktorsson K; De Petris L
Lung Cancer; 2018 Jun; 120():75-81. PubMed ID: 29748020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 7th and 8th editions of the UICC/AJCC TNM staging for non-small cell lung cancer in a non-metastatic North American cohort undergoing primary radiation treatment.
Koul R; Rathod S; Dubey A; Bashir B; Chowdhury A
Lung Cancer; 2018 Sep; 123():116-120. PubMed ID: 30089581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AJCC 7th edition staging classification is more applicable than AJCC 8th edition staging classification for invasive IPMN.
Fan Z; Cheng H; Jin K; Gong Y; Huang Q; Xu J; Ni Q; Yu X; Liu C; Luo G
World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Aug; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 31387646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of model fit and discriminatory ability of M category as defined by the 7th and 8th editions of the tumor-node-metastasis classification of colorectal cancer and the 9th edition of the Japanese classification.
Shida D; Boku N; Nakamura Y; Yoshida T; Tanabe T; Yasui K; Takashima A; Kanemitsu Y
Cancer Med; 2021 Oct; 10(20):6937-6946. PubMed ID: 34587374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A long-term conditional survival analysis for gastric cancer based on 7th and 8th TNM classification in Eastern and Western populations.
Chen QY; Zheng CH; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Lu J; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang CM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1949-1954. PubMed ID: 30197165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the seventh and eighth editions of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: analysis of 1317 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy at two centers.
Yang XL; Wang Y; Liang SB; He SS; Chen DM; Chen HY; Lu LX; Chen Y
BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):606. PubMed ID: 29843648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The Comparison between 6th and 7th International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Survival Prognosis of Gastric Cancer].
Kim SS; Choi BY; Seo SI; Jung MY; Choi HS; Ahn SM; Choi WH; Kim HS; Kim KH; Jang MK; Lee JH; Kim HY; Shin WG
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2011 Nov; 58(5):258-63. PubMed ID: 22113042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the new AJCC eighth edition of the TNM classification for breast cancer with a single-center breast cancer cohort.
Kim JY; Lim JE; Jung HH; Cho SY; Cho EY; Lee SK; Yu JH; Lee JE; Kim SW; Nam SJ; Park YH; Ahn JS; Im YH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Oct; 171(3):737-745. PubMed ID: 29931426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation.
Fang C; Wang W; Deng JY; Sun Z; Seeruttun SR; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Liang H; Zhou ZW
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Nov; 38(1):67. PubMed ID: 30454049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survival in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Comparative Analysis Between the 7th and 8th Versions of the AJCC/UICC Staging System Based on the SEER Database.
Yang F; Zhong Q; Huang Z; Lian M; Fang J
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2019; 10():10. PubMed ID: 30733707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Surgical Treatment of Lung Cancer: How Has the Introduction of the 8th Edition of the TNM Classification Affected Guideline-Based Therapy?].
Robold T; Neumeier J; Ried M; Neu R; Sziklavari Z; Grosser C; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Hofmann HS
Zentralbl Chir; 2020 Dec; 145(6):589-596. PubMed ID: 32629508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system for gastric cancer is superior to the 7th edition: results from a Chinese mono-institutional study of 1663 patients.
Ji X; Bu ZD; Yan Y; Li ZY; Wu AW; Zhang LH; Zhang J; Wu XJ; Zong XL; Li SX; Shan F; Jia ZY; Ji JF
Gastric Cancer; 2018 Jul; 21(4):643-652. PubMed ID: 29168120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superiority of the 8th edition of the TNM staging system for predicting overall survival in gastric cancer: Comparative analysis of the 7th and 8th editions in a monoinstitutional cohort.
Wang H; Guo W; Hu Y; Mou T; Zhao L; Chen H; Lin T; Li T; Yu J; Liu H; Li G
Mol Clin Oncol; 2018 Oct; 9(4):423-431. PubMed ID: 30214731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Data-driven optimization of version 9 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for anal cancer.
Janczewski LM; Browner A; Cotler J; Nelson H; Ballman KV; LeBlanc M; Gollub MJ; Eng C; Brierley JD; Palefsky JM; Goldberg RM; Goodman KA; Washington MK; Asare EA; Palis B
Cancer; 2024 May; 130(9):1702-1710. PubMed ID: 38140735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the 8th Edition of the UICC-TNM Classification on Clinical Stage 0-IA Lung Adenocarcinoma: Does the New Classification Predict Postoperative Prognosis More Precisely than the Previous One?
Wang L; Anraku M; Sato M; Nitadori JI; Nagayama K; Kitano K; Nakajima J
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Oct; 24(5):223-229. PubMed ID: 29848840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
