255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32574478)
1. Single-Sided Deafness-Outcomes of Three Interventions for Profound Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Fogels J; Jönsson R; Sadeghi A; Flynn M; Flynn T
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Jul; 41(6):736-744. PubMed ID: 32574478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Randomized Crossover Study in Single-Sided Deafness Comparing a Cartilage Conduction CROS System and an Air-Conduction CROS System.
Takaki K; Kashio A; Nozaki E; Kanai T; Kamogashira T; Saze F; Uranaka T; Urata S; Koyama H; Kawahara Y; Yamasoba T
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jul; 45(6):635-642. PubMed ID: 38769110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: Six-month results from a multicentre study.
den Besten CA; Monksfield P; Bosman A; Skarzynski PH; Green K; Runge C; Wigren S; Blechert JI; Flynn MC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 30358920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ontario Health (Quality)
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(1):1-165. PubMed ID: 32194878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subjective and objective outcomes from new BiCROS technology in a veteran sample.
Williams VA; McArdle RA; Chisolm TH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):789-806. PubMed ID: 23169196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.
Niparko JK; Cox KM; Lustig LR
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12544032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
Bishop CE; Hamadain E; Galster JA; Johnson MF; Spankovich C; Windmill I
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contralateral Routing of Signal Yields Significant Speech in Noise Benefit for Unilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Dwyer RT; Kessler D; Butera IM; Gifford RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 30461413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness in Rehabilitation of Current Wireless CROS Technology in Experienced Bone-Anchored Implant Users.
Snapp HA; Hoffer ME; Liu X; Rajguru SM
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 29135863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison between wireless CROS/BiCROS and soft-band BAHA for patients with unilateral hearing loss.
Choi JE; Ma SM; Park H; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212503. PubMed ID: 30789931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Hearing Device Use on Speech-in-Noise Performance in Children with Severe-to-Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss.
Griffin AM; Atri A; Licameli G; Stiles DJ
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):588-602. PubMed ID: 36575571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Speech-in-Noise and Localization Benefits in Unilateral Hearing Loss Subjects Using Contralateral Routing of Signal Hearing Aids or Bone-Anchored Implants.
Snapp HA; Holt FD; Liu X; Rajguru SM
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 27846038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-term outcomes of cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness compared to bone conduction devices and contralateral routing of sound hearing aids-Results of a Randomised controlled trial (CINGLE-trial).
Peters JPM; van Heteren JAA; Wendrich AW; van Zanten GA; Grolman W; Stokroos RJ; Smit AL
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0257447. PubMed ID: 34644322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefit of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral cochlear implant users.
Weder S; Kompis M; Caversaccio M; Stieger C
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 25501444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurements.
Hol MK; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):999-1006. PubMed ID: 16151349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech Perception in Noise and Sound Localization for Cochlear Implant With Single-Sided Deafness Compared With Contralateral Routing of Signal Hearing Aids.
Oyamada S; Takahashi M; Furutate S; Oka S; Kubota E; Sakurai A; Uekusa T; Watanabe K; Iwasaki S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):331-338. PubMed ID: 36946362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral inner ear deafness: a study of 20 patients.
Hol MK; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(5):274-81. PubMed ID: 15316200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparison Between Wireless CROS and Bone-anchored Hearing Devices for Single-sided Deafness: A Pilot Study.
Finbow J; Bance M; Aiken S; Gulliver M; Verge J; Caissie R
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jun; 36(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 25853611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
