These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32580715)

  • 1. GUIP1: a R package for dose escalation strategies in phase I cancer clinical trials.
    Dinart D; Fraisse J; Tosi D; Mauguen A; Touraine C; Gourgou S; Le Deley MC; Bellera C; Mollevi C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jun; 20(1):134. PubMed ID: 32580715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Escalation with overdose control using all toxicities and time to event toxicity data in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
    Chen Z; Cui Y; Owonikoko TK; Wang Z; Li Z; Luo R; Kutner M; Khuri FR; Kowalski J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2014 Mar; 37(2):322-32. PubMed ID: 24530487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rolling continual reassessment method with overdose control: An efficient and safe dose escalation design.
    Zhu J; Sabanés Bové D; Liao Z; Beyer U; Yung G; Sarkar S
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 107():106436. PubMed ID: 34000410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Practicalities in running early-phase trials using the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TiTE-CRM) for interventions with long toxicity periods using two radiotherapy oncology trials as examples.
    van Werkhoven E; Hinsley S; Frangou E; Holmes J; de Haan R; Hawkins M; Brown S; Love SB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):162. PubMed ID: 32571298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new pragmatic design for dose escalation in phase 1 clinical trials using an adaptive continual reassessment method.
    North B; Kocher HM; Sasieni P
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):632. PubMed ID: 31242873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method.
    Normolle D; Lawrence T
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Sep; 24(27):4426-33. PubMed ID: 16983110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Designing and evaluating dose-escalation studies made easy: The MoDEsT web app.
    Pallmann P; Wan F; Mander AP; Wheeler GM; Yap C; Clive S; Hampson LV; Jaki T
    Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 31856600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical modifications to the time-to-event continual reassessment method for phase I cancer trials with fast patient accrual and late-onset toxicities.
    Polley MY
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2130-43. PubMed ID: 21590790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phase I dose-escalation oncology trials with sequential multiple schedules.
    Günhan BK; Weber S; Seroutou A; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):69. PubMed ID: 33853539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. np1: a computer program for dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials.
    Kramar A; Houédé N; Paoletti X
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Oct; 88(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 17719124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvements to the Escalation with Overdose Control design and a comparison with the restricted Continual Reassessment Method.
    Ji L; Lewinger JP; Krailo M; Groshen S; Conti DV; Asgharzadeh S; Sposto R
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Nov; 18(6):659-670. PubMed ID: 31237419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure driven dose escalation design with overdose control: Concept and first real life experience in an oncology phase I trial.
    Micallef S; Sostelly A; Zhu J; Baverel PG; Mercier F
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2022 Apr; 26():100901. PubMed ID: 35198796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose-finding approach for dose escalation with overdose control considering incomplete observations.
    Mauguen A; Le Deley MC; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1584-94. PubMed ID: 21351289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose escalation with overdose control using a quasi-continuous toxicity score in cancer Phase I clinical trials.
    Chen Z; Tighiouart M; Kowalski J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Sep; 33(5):949-58. PubMed ID: 22561391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CRM2DIM: A SAS macro for implementing the dual-agent Bayesian continual reassessment method.
    Bayar MA; Ivanova A; Le Teuff G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Jul; 176():211-223. PubMed ID: 31200907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DICE: A Bayesian model for early dose finding in phase I trials with multiple treatment courses.
    Ursino M; Biard L; Chevret S
    Biom J; 2022 Dec; 64(8):1486-1497. PubMed ID: 34729815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to design a dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method.
    Wheeler GM; Mander AP; Bedding A; Brock K; Cornelius V; Grieve AP; Jaki T; Love SB; Odondi L; Weir CJ; Yap C; Bond SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):18. PubMed ID: 30658575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-stage subgroup-specific time-to-event (2S-Sub-TITE): An adaptive two-stage time-to-toxicity design for subgroup-specific dose finding in phase I oncology trials.
    McGovern A; Chapple AG; Ma C
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Nov; 21(6):1138-1148. PubMed ID: 35560864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Interval Design to Accelerate Phase I Trials.
    Yuan Y; Lin R; Li D; Nie L; Warren KE
    Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Oct; 24(20):4921-4930. PubMed ID: 29769209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toxicity-dependent feasibility bounds for the escalation with overdose control approach in phase I cancer trials.
    Wheeler GM; Sweeting MJ; Mander AP
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(16):2499-2513. PubMed ID: 28295513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.