These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32581477)

  • 1. Evaluation of Marginal Microleakage and Depth of Penetration of Different Materials Used as Pit and Fissure Sealants: An
    Butail A; Dua P; Mangla R; Saini S; Chauhan A; Rana S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 32581477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of Penetration Depth and Microleakage of Different Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Dye Penetration Method: An
    Dixit A; Awasthi N; Jha S; Suprakasam S; Penumatsa NV; Vijayan AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):890-893. PubMed ID: 34753840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy.
    Arastoo S; Behbudi A; Rakhshan V
    Front Dent; 2019; 16(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 31608333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of nanocomposites as pit and fissure sealants in child patients.
    Singh S; Pandey RK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 22016312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative Evaluation of Two Different Pit & Fissure Sealants and a Restorative Material to check their Microleakage - An In Vitro Study.
    Joshi K; Dave B; Joshi N; Rajashekhara B; Jobanputra LH; Yagnik K
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Aug; 5(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 24155619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Microleakage of Different Types of Pit and Fissure Sealants: An
    Prabahar T; Chowdhary N; Konkappa KN; Vundela RR; Balamurugan S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(5):535-540. PubMed ID: 36865737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal Microleakage of Conventional Fissure Sealants and Self-Adhering Flowable Composite as Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth.
    Rahimian-Imam S; Ramazani N; Fayazi MR
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Jun; 12(6):430-5. PubMed ID: 26884777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An
    Singh R; Lakhanam M
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(3):304-310. PubMed ID: 35991789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro comparison of microleakage of two materials used as pit and fissure sealants.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Soleymani A; Heydari Z
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2011; 5(3):83-6. PubMed ID: 22991611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage Assessment of Two Different Pit and Fissure Sealants: A Comparative Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study.
    Prabakar J; Indiran MA; Kumar P; Dooraikannan S; Jeevanandan G
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020; 13(Suppl 1):S29-S33. PubMed ID: 34434011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Microleakage and Penetration Depth between Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Primary Second Molar.
    Gawali PN; Chaugule VB; Panse AM
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(4):291-295. PubMed ID: 28127158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Analysis of Techniques for Pit and Fissure Sealant Application to Reduce Microleakage.
    Patil P; Padmawar NS; Girdhar D; Singh S; Shah YD; Gupta S
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54984. PubMed ID: 38550456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite, a Self-Adhesive Fissure Sealant and a Conventional Fissure Sealant in Permanent Teeth with/without Saliva Contamination.
    Hosseinipour ZS; Heidari A; Shahrabi M; Poorzandpoush K
    Front Dent; 2019; 16(4):239-247. PubMed ID: 32342052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage and penetration depth of different fissure sealant materials after cyclic thermo-mechanic and brushing simulation.
    Hatirli H; Yasa B; Yasa E
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jan; 37(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 28845033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative Evaluation of the Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Three Filled Pit and Fissure Sealants Using Subpressure and Adhesive System: An Experimental Analysis.
    Waghmode SK; Devendrappa SN; Hadakar SG; Gaonkar NN; Gugawad S; Taur S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Aug; 16(Suppl 1):S97-S100. PubMed ID: 37663217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Moisture-tolerant Sealant and Glass Ionomer Sealant Using Stereomicroscope: An
    Priscilla S; Shivashankarappa PG; Mohandoss S; Muthukrishnan K; Gem E
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2023 Aug; 16(Suppl 1):S67-S71. PubMed ID: 37663211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of different materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants.
    Pardi V; Sinhoreti MA; Pereira AC; Ambrosano GM; Meneghim Mde C
    Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 16721465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Evaluation of the Marginal Sealing Ability of two Commercially Available Pit and Fissure Sealants.
    Sridhar LP; Moses J; Rangeeth BN; Sivakumar S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Sep; 10(9):ZC01-ZC04. PubMed ID: 27790568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of different pit and fissure sealants.
    Babaji P; Vaid S; Deep S; Mishra S; Srivastava M; Manjooran T
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016 Aug; 6(Suppl 2):S111-5. PubMed ID: 27652241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of occlusal pits and fissures morphology modification techniques before application of sealants: An
    Singh A; ; Patil V; Juyal M; Raj R; Rangari P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(2):247-251. PubMed ID: 32436905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.