These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32582884)

  • 1. Going the Extra Mile: Effects of Discourse Context on Two Late Positivities During Language Comprehension.
    Brothers T; Wlotko EW; Warnke L; Kuperberg GR
    Neurobiol Lang (Camb); 2020; 1(1):135-160. PubMed ID: 32582884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociating predictability, plausibility and possibility of sentence continuations in reading: evidence from late-positivity ERPs.
    Quante L; Bölte J; Zwitserlood P
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5717. PubMed ID: 30345170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation.
    Kuperberg GR; Brothers T; Wlotko EW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 32(1):12-35. PubMed ID: 31479347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.
    Van Petten C; Luka BJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):176-90. PubMed ID: 22019481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension.
    DeLong KA; Quante L; Kutas M
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Aug; 61():150-62. PubMed ID: 24953958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discourse coherence modulates use of predictive processing during sentence comprehension.
    Carter GA; Hoffman P
    Cognition; 2024 Jan; 242():105637. PubMed ID: 37857052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.
    Kuperberg GR
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():23-49. PubMed ID: 17400197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: evidence from the N400.
    van Berkum JJ; Hagoort P; Brown CM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1999 Nov; 11(6):657-71. PubMed ID: 10601747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional Role of the N400 and P600 in Language-Related ERP Studies with Respect to Semantic Anomalies: An Overview.
    Seyednozadi Z; Pishghadam R; Pishghadam M
    Noro Psikiyatr Ars; 2021; 58(3):249-252. PubMed ID: 34526850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confusing similar words: ERP correlates of lexical-semantic processing in first language attrition and late second language acquisition.
    Kasparian K; Steinhauer K
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):200-217. PubMed ID: 27751710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Graded and ungraded expectation patterns: Prediction dynamics during active comprehension.
    Lai MK; Payne BR; Federmeier KD
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Jan; 61(1):e14424. PubMed ID: 37670720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What we know about knowing: Presuppositions generated by factive verbs influence downstream neural processing.
    Shetreet E; Alexander EJ; Romoli J; Chierchia G; Kuperberg G
    Cognition; 2019 Mar; 184():96-106. PubMed ID: 30584974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple predictions during language comprehension: Friends, foes, or indifferent companions?
    Brothers T; Morgan E; Yacovone A; Kuperberg G
    Cognition; 2023 Dec; 241():105602. PubMed ID: 37716311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. States of indecision in the brain: ERP reflections of syntactic agreement violations versus visual degradation.
    van de Meerendonk N; Chwilla DJ; Kolk HH
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jul; 51(8):1383-96. PubMed ID: 23583967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Event-related potentials index lexical retrieval (N400) and integration (P600) during language comprehension.
    Delogu F; Brouwer H; Crocker MW
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103569. PubMed ID: 31202158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences.
    Osterhout L
    Brain Lang; 1997 Oct; 59(3):494-522. PubMed ID: 9299074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tell me sweet little lies: An event-related potentials study on the processing of social lies.
    Moreno EM; Casado P; Martín-Loeches M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 16(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 27007770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration or predictability? A further specification of the functional role of gamma oscillations in language comprehension.
    Wang L; Zhu Z; Bastiaansen M
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():187. PubMed ID: 22701443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.