190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32583223)
1. Evaluation of the concordance in HPV type between self- and physician-collected samples using a brush-based device and a PCR-based HPV DNA test in Japanese referred patients with abnormal cytology or HPV infection.
Onuma T; Kurokawa T; Shinagawa A; Chino Y; Yoshida Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Oct; 25(10):1854-1860. PubMed ID: 32583223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of different strategies for the triage to colposcopy of women tested high-risk HPV positive on self-collected cervicovaginal samples.
Chatzistamatiou K; Tsertanidou A; Moysiadis T; Mouchtaropoulou E; Pasentsis K; Skenderi A; Stamatopoulos K; Agorastos T
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 162(3):560-568. PubMed ID: 34210517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of a new HPV self-sampling device for cervical cancer screening: The Cervical and Self-Sample In Screening (CASSIS) study.
El-Zein M; Bouten S; Louvanto K; Gilbert L; Gotlieb W; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):491-497. PubMed ID: 29678360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can human papillomavirus DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compare with physician-collected cervical samples and cytology for cervical cancer screening in developing countries?
Bhatla N; Dar L; Patro AR; Kumar P; Kriplani A; Gulati A; Iyer VK; Mathur SR; Sreenivas V; Shah KV; Gravitt PE
Cancer Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 33(6):446-50. PubMed ID: 19931499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of CIN2+ /CIN3+ risk of different HPV subtypes infection combined with abnormal cytology status].
Luo HX; Du H; Liu ZH; Zhang LJ; Wang C; Wu RF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 40(3):232-238. PubMed ID: 29575846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct comparison of two vaginal self-sampling devices for the detection of human papillomavirus infections.
Jentschke M; Chen K; Arbyn M; Hertel B; Noskowicz M; Soergel P; Hillemanns P
J Clin Virol; 2016 Sep; 82():46-50. PubMed ID: 27434147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of human papillomavirus detection by Aptima HPV and cobas HPV tests in a population of women referred for colposcopy following detection of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance by Pap cytology.
Castle PE; Eaton B; Reid J; Getman D; Dockter J
J Clin Microbiol; 2015 Apr; 53(4):1277-81. PubMed ID: 25653409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An automated quantitative DNA image cytometry system detects abnormal cells in cervical cytology with high sensitivity.
Wong OG; Ho MW; Tsun OK; Ng AK; Tsui EY; Chow JN; Ip PP; Cheung AN
Cytopathology; 2018 Jun; 29(3):267-274. PubMed ID: 29578257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Punch biopsy guided by both colposcopy and HR-HPV status is more efficient for identification of immediate high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse among HPV-infected women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Ding Z; Li Y; Chen A; Song M; Zhang Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():32-36. PubMed ID: 27816739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brush-based self-sampling in combination with GP5+/6+-PCR-based hrHPV testing: high concordance with physician-taken cervical scrapes for HPV genotyping and detection of high-grade CIN.
Dijkstra MG; Heideman DA; van Kemenade FJ; Hogewoning KJ; Hesselink AT; Verkuijten MC; van Baal WM; Boer GM; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
J Clin Virol; 2012 Jun; 54(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 22445557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Performance of human papillomavirus typing test in cervical precancer lesions and cervical cancer screening].
Zhang SK; Luo XP; Li ZF; Su Z; Xia JC; Hu GY; Zhu YJ; Xie LX; Feng XX; Sun XB; Chen W; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 42(3):252-256. PubMed ID: 32252206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The reliability of high-risk human papillomavirus detection by Aptima HPV assay in women with ASC-US cytology.
Castle PE; Reid J; Dockter J; Getman D
J Clin Virol; 2015 Aug; 69():52-5. PubMed ID: 26209379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Good concordance of HPV detection between cervico-vaginal self-samples and general practitioner-collected samples using the Cobas 4800 HPV DNA test.
Tranberg M; Jensen JS; Bech BH; Blaakær J; Svanholm H; Andersen B
BMC Infect Dis; 2018 Jul; 18(1):348. PubMed ID: 30053836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HPV testing in first-void urine provides sensitivity for CIN2+ detection comparable with a smear taken by a clinician or a brush-based self-sample: cross-sectional data from a triage population.
Leeman A; Del Pino M; Molijn A; Rodriguez A; Torné A; de Koning M; Ordi J; van Kemenade F; Jenkins D; Quint W
BJOG; 2017 Aug; 124(9):1356-1363. PubMed ID: 28391609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of the effectiveness of BMRT-HPV for cervical cancer screening].
Duan LF; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Qu XF; Duan XZ; Liu Y; Shi B; Zhang W; Wei LH; Belinson L; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Oct; 55(10):708-715. PubMed ID: 33120484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of a six-methylation-marker assay on self-collected cervical samples - A feasibility study.
Klischke L; von Ehr J; Kohls F; Kampers J; Hülse F; Schmitz M; Hennig A; Dörk T; Hillemanns P; Jentschke M
J Virol Methods; 2021 Sep; 295():114219. PubMed ID: 34175345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Performance of vaginal self-sampling high-risk HPV genotyping as primary and combining cytology or viral load as secondary in cervical cancer screening].
Guo CL; Luo HX; Wang C; Qu XF; Yang B; Belinson JL; Du H; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 56(4):271-279. PubMed ID: 33902239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Performance of the RealTi
Latsuzbaia A; Vanden Broeck D; Van Keer S; Weyers S; Tjalma WAA; Doyen J; Donders G; De Sutter P; Vorsters A; Peeters E; Arbyn M
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Oct; 10(5):e0163122. PubMed ID: 36047900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
