197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32583366)
1. Circumspection in using automated measures: Talker gender and addressee affect error rates for adult speech detection in the Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) system.
Lehet M; Arjmandi MK; Houston D; Dilley L
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):113-138. PubMed ID: 32583366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation and agreement between Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA™) and manual transcription for Dutch natural language recordings.
Busch T; Sangen A; Vanpoucke F; van Wieringen A
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1921-1932. PubMed ID: 28936690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated Language Environment Analysis: A Research Synthesis.
Greenwood CR; Schnitz AG; Irvin D; Tsai SF; Carta JJ
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 May; 27(2):853-867. PubMed ID: 29594313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of automatic and manual measures of turn-taking in monolingual and bilingual contexts.
Ferjan Ramirez N; Hippe DS; Braverman A; Weiss Y; Kuhl PK
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1936-1952. PubMed ID: 37145293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Language ENvironment Analysis system (LENA): A validation study with Italian-learning children.
Bastianello T; Lorenzini I; Nazzi T; Majorano M
J Child Lang; 2023 Jun; ():1-21. PubMed ID: 37340837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Look who's talking: A comparison of automated and human-generated speaker tags in naturalistic day-long recordings.
Bulgarelli F; Bergelson E
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Apr; 52(2):641-653. PubMed ID: 31342467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A thorough evaluation of the Language Environment Analysis (LENA) system.
Cristia A; Lavechin M; Scaff C; Soderstrom M; Rowland C; Räsänen O; Bunce J; Bergelson E
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Apr; 53(2):467-486. PubMed ID: 32728916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A meta-analysis of the predictability of LENA™ automated measures for child language development.
Wang Y; Williams R; Dilley L; Houston DM
Dev Rev; 2020 Sep; 57():. PubMed ID: 32632339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The validity of LENA technology for assessing the linguistic environment and interactions of infants learning Hebrew and Arabic.
Levin-Asher B; Segal O; Kishon-Rabin L
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1480-1495. PubMed ID: 35668342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ALICE: An open-source tool for automatic measurement of phoneme, syllable, and word counts from child-centered daylong recordings.
Räsänen O; Seshadri S; Lavechin M; Cristia A; Casillas M
Behav Res Methods; 2021 Apr; 53(2):818-835. PubMed ID: 32875399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating language environment analysis system performance for Chinese: a pilot study in Shanghai.
Gilkerson J; Zhang Y; Xu D; Richards JA; Xu X; Jiang F; Harnsberger J; Topping K
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):445-52. PubMed ID: 25614978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How effective is LENA in detecting speech vocalizations and language produced by children and adolescents with ASD in different contexts?
Jones RM; Plesa Skwerer D; Pawar R; Hamo A; Carberry C; Ajodan EL; Caulley D; Silverman MR; McAdoo S; Meyer S; Yoder A; Clements M; Lord C; Tager-Flusberg H
Autism Res; 2019 Apr; 12(4):628-635. PubMed ID: 30638310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of the Language ENvironment Analysis system (LENA™) in European French.
Canault M; Le Normand MT; Foudil S; Loundon N; Thai-Van H
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):1109-24. PubMed ID: 26174716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the Language ENvironment Analysis System for Korean.
McDonald M; Kwon T; Kim H; Lee Y; Ko ES
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 64(3):792-808. PubMed ID: 33651954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electronic media and social features of language input in bilingually-raised Latinx infants.
Ferjan Ramírez N; Hippe DS; Lindekugel K
Infant Behav Dev; 2022 Aug; 68():101740. PubMed ID: 35749825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fidelity of Automatic Speech Processing for Adult and Child Talker Classifications.
VanDam M; Silbert NH
PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160588. PubMed ID: 27529813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of the Language Environment Analysis Recording System in Analyzing French-English Bilingual Speech.
Orena AJ; Byers-Heinlein K; Polka L
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jul; 62(7):2491-2500. PubMed ID: 31194915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing Automatic and Manual Measures of Parent-Infant Conversational Turns: A Word of Caution.
Ferjan Ramírez N; Hippe DS; Kuhl PK
Child Dev; 2021 Mar; 92(2):672-681. PubMed ID: 33421100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Challenge of Listening at Home: Speech and Noise Levels in Homes of Young Children With Hearing Loss.
Benítez-Barrera CR; Grantham DW; Hornsby BWY
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1575-1585. PubMed ID: 33136633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of the Language Environment Analyses (LENA
Marchman VA; Weisleder A; Hurtado N; Fernald A
J Child Lang; 2021 May; 48(3):605-620. PubMed ID: 32690113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
