These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32583944)

  • 1. Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre-clinical models.
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout S; Parker J; Sconzert K; Li Y; Kottenstette N; Madsen A; Sungur JM; Bergman P
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 97(3):E327-E332. PubMed ID: 32583944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Network latency and long-distance robotic telestenting: Exploring the potential impact of network delays on telestenting performance.
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Bush J; Martin S; Rash AJ; Tan JM; Parker JL; Kalafut A; Li Y; Kottenstette N; Bergman P; Nowak B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Apr; 95(5):914-919. PubMed ID: 31410958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Percutaneous coronary intervention using a combination of robotics and telecommunications by an operator in a separate physical location from the patient: an early exploration into the feasibility of telestenting (the REMOTE-PCI study).
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout SM; Jacoby ME; Collins JS; Borgman AS; Mulder AN; Elmore MA; Campbell JL; McNamara RF; Wohns DH
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Jan; 12(13):1569-1576. PubMed ID: 28105993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion.
    Harrison J; Ang L; Naghi J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Mahmud E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jul; 19(5 Pt A):526-531. PubMed ID: 29221959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report.
    Smitson CC; Ang L; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M; Mahmud E
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):152-156. PubMed ID: 29335386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Mahmud E; Naghi J; Ang L; Harrison J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(13):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 28683937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remote robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: An animal feasibility study.
    Eleid MF; Zheng PP; Gulati R; Bergman P; Kottenstette N; Li Y; Lerman A; Sandhu GS
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 97(3):E274-E279. PubMed ID: 32442332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the R-One robotic system for percutaneous coronary intervention: the R-EVOLUTION study.
    Durand E; Sabatier R; Smits PC; Verheye S; Pereira B; Fajadet J
    EuroIntervention; 2023 Apr; 18(16):e1339-e1347. PubMed ID: 36602883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementation of Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Into a High-Risk PCI Program.
    Chitturi KR; Kanake S; Nguyen T; Loc B; Baden K; Bavishi C; Kumar A; Liu Z; Chan A; Karuparthi PR; Hirai T
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Oct; 43():115-119. PubMed ID: 35610138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cath Lab Robotics: Paradigm Change in Interventional Cardiology?
    Wegermann ZK; Swaminathan RV; Rao SV
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2019 Aug; 21(10):119. PubMed ID: 31473815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complication during robotic-PCI: Iatrogenic guiding catheter dissection.
    Khokhar AA; Zelias A; Zlahoda-Huzior A; Dudek D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Apr; 99(5):1526-1528. PubMed ID: 35094475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.
    Weisz G; Metzger DC; Caputo RP; Delgado JA; Marshall JJ; Vetrovec GW; Reisman M; Waksman R; Granada JF; Novack V; Moses JW; Carrozza JP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 61(15):1596-600. PubMed ID: 23500318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal Geographic Miss (LGM) in Robotic Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Bezerra HG; Mehanna E; W Vetrovec G; A Costa M; Weisz G
    J Interv Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 28(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 26489972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of robotic telestenting over long geographic distances: a pre-clinical ex vivo and in vivo study.
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Bush J; Martin S; Rash A; Tan JM; Parker J; Li Y; Kottenstette N; Bergman P; Nowak B
    EuroIntervention; 2019 Aug; 15(6):e510-e512. PubMed ID: 30987962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of network performance on remote robotic-assisted endovascular interventions in porcine model.
    Legeza P; Britz GW; Shah A; Sconzert K; Sungur JM; Chinnadurai P; Sinha K; Lumsden AB
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Feb; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 33550514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resource Utilization During Elective Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Mangels D; Fregoso A; Ang L; Mahmud E
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 32(12):E321-E325. PubMed ID: 32829309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Traditional Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Cohort.
    Patel TM; Shah SC; Soni YY; Radadiya RC; Patel GA; Tiwari PO; Pancholy SB
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(5):e008888. PubMed ID: 32406263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Angiographic and clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis of bifurcated lesions.
    Coroleu SF; De Vita M; Burzotta F; Trani C; Porto I; Niccoli G; Leone AM; Tommasino A; Talarico GP; Schiavoni G; Crea F
    EuroIntervention; 2012 Oct; 8(6):701-7. PubMed ID: 23086788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complex robotic compared to manual coronary interventions: 6- and 12-month outcomes.
    Walters D; Reeves RR; Patel M; Naghi J; Ang L; Mahmud E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Mar; 93(4):613-617. PubMed ID: 30456889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First Experience of Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan.
    Kagiyama K; Ueno T; Mitsutake Y; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y
    Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 58(23):3415-3419. PubMed ID: 31366804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.