These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32584064)

  • 21. Inside interrogation: the lie, the bluff, and false confessions.
    Perillo JT; Kassin SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 20734122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does "Jamal" receive a harsher sentence than "James"? First-name bias in the criminal sentencing of Black men.
    Kenthirarajah DT; Camp NP; Walton GM; Kay AC; Cohen GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):169-181. PubMed ID: 36931856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can the punishment fit the crime when suspects confess child sexual abuse?
    Faller KC; Birdsall WC; Vandervort F; Henry J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2006 Jul; 30(7):815-27. PubMed ID: 16844218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendations.
    Kassin SM; Drizin SA; Grisso T; Gudjonsson GH; Leo RA; Redlich AD
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Feb; 34(1):3-38. PubMed ID: 19603261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Indigenous Partner Violence, Indigenous Sentencing Courts, and Pathways to Desistance.
    Marchetti E; Daly K
    Violence Against Women; 2017 Oct; 23(12):1513-1535. PubMed ID: 27630222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How confession characteristics impact juror perceptions of evidence in criminal trials.
    Shifton JJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):90-108. PubMed ID: 30706960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptions of custody: Similarities and disparities among police, judges, social psychologists, and laypeople.
    Alceste F; Kassin SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):197-214. PubMed ID: 34351203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The relationship between victim impact statements and judicial decision making: An archival analysis of sentencing outcomes.
    Dufour GK; Ternes M; Stinson V
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Aug; 47(4):484-498. PubMed ID: 37347897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contextual Influences on the Sentencing of Individuals Convicted of Sexual Crimes.
    Thompson L; Rydberg J; Cassidy M; Socia KM
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Oct; 32(7):778-805. PubMed ID: 31154899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interrogated with Intellectual Disabilities: The Risks of False Confession.
    Schatz SJ
    Stanford Law Rev; 2018 Feb; 70(2):643-90. PubMed ID: 29486553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Guilty by his fibers: suspect confession versus textile fibers reconstructed simulation.
    Suzuki S; Higashikawa Y; Sugita R; Suzuki Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Aug; 189(1-3):e27-32. PubMed ID: 19411148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Do laypeople recognize youth as a risk factor for false confession? A test of the 'common sense' hypothesis.
    Grove LJ; Kukucka J
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(2):185-205. PubMed ID: 34712091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An explanation for camera perspective bias in voluntariness judgment for video-recorded confession: Suggestion of cognitive frame.
    Park K; Pyo J
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):184-94. PubMed ID: 22667808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interrogations, confessions, and adolescent offenders' perceptions of the legal system.
    Arndorfer A; Malloy LC; Cauffman E
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Oct; 39(5):503-13. PubMed ID: 26011040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Police practices and perceptions regarding juvenile interrogation and interrogative suggestibility.
    Meyer JR; Reppucci ND
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):757-80. PubMed ID: 18046744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does video recording alter the behavior of police during interrogation? A mock crime-and-investigation study.
    Kassin SM; Kukucka J; Lawson VZ; DeCarlo J
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 23876091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the benefits of a rapport-based approach to investigative interviews: A training study with law enforcement investigators.
    Brimbal L; Meissner CA; Kleinman SM; Phillips EL; Atkinson DJ; Dianiska RE; Rothweiler JN; Oleszkiewicz S; Jones MS
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 33734749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Some sex differences in sentencing severity for a mock crime scenario.
    McKelvie SJ
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Jun; 100(3 Pt 1):894-6. PubMed ID: 17688108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence-based suspicion and the prior probability of guilt in police interrogations.
    Moody SA; Cabell JJ; Livingston TN; Yang Y
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):307-319. PubMed ID: 36480409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession.
    Woestehoff SA; Meissner CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):564-79. PubMed ID: 27227274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.