These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32584070)

  • 21. Parafoveal activation of sign translation previews among deaf readers during the reading of Chinese sentences.
    Pan J; Shu H; Wang Y; Yan M
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):964-72. PubMed ID: 25707914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reading proficiency predicts the extent of the right, but not left, perceptual span in older readers.
    Veldre A; Wong R; Andrews S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 33155127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Age-related sparing of parafoveal lexical processing.
    Grabbe JW; Allen PA
    Exp Aging Res; 2013; 39(4):419-44. PubMed ID: 23875839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reading proficiency modulates parafoveal processing efficiency: evidence from reading Chinese as a second language.
    Wang A; Zhou W; Shu H; Yan M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():29-33. PubMed ID: 25103417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A New Font, Specifically Designed for Peripheral Vision, Improves Peripheral Letter and Word Recognition, but Not Eye-Mediated Reading Performance.
    Bernard JB; Aguilar C; Castet E
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0152506. PubMed ID: 27074013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements.
    Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB; White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1714-1729. PubMed ID: 29672115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of foveal lexical processing load on parafoveal preview and saccadic targeting during Chinese reading.
    Zhang M; Liversedge SP; Bai X; Yan G; Zang C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jun; 45(6):812-825. PubMed ID: 31120302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Skilled deaf readers have an enhanced perceptual span in reading.
    Bélanger NN; Slattery TJ; Mayberry RI; Rayner K
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jul; 23(7):816-23. PubMed ID: 22683830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adult age differences in parafoveal preview effects during reading: Evidence from Chinese.
    He L; Ma W; Shen F; Wang Y; Wu J; Warrington KL; Liversedge SP; Paterson KB
    Psychol Aging; 2021 Nov; 36(7):822-833. PubMed ID: 34766800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cognitive load eliminates the effect of perceptual information on judgments of learning with sentences.
    Luna K; Albuquerque PB; Martín-Luengo B
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):106-116. PubMed ID: 30168094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Parafoveal processing across different lexical constituents in Chinese reading.
    Cui L; Drieghe D; Yan G; Bai X; Chi H; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):403-16. PubMed ID: 22992208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electrophysiological evidence of sublexical phonological access in character processing by L2 Chinese learners of L1 alphabetic scripts.
    Yum YN; Law SP; Mo KN; Lau D; Su IF; Shum MS
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):339-52. PubMed ID: 26620688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate.
    Pelli DG; Tillman KA; Freeman J; Su M; Berger TD; Majaj NJ
    J Vis; 2007 Oct; 7(2):20.1-36. PubMed ID: 18217835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sensory constraints on perceptual simulation during sentence reading.
    Gao X; Jiang T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):848-855. PubMed ID: 29154621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual Learning of Visual Span Improves Chinese Reading Speed.
    Zhu Z; Hu Y; Liao C; Huang R; Keel S; Liu Y; He M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 May; 60(6):2357-2368. PubMed ID: 31136652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
    Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of word length on eye guidance differ for young and older Chinese readers.
    Li S; Li L; Wang J; McGowan VA; Paterson KB
    Psychol Aging; 2018 Jun; 33(4):685-692. PubMed ID: 29902059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are there preferred viewing locations in Chinese reading? Evidence from eye-tracking and computer simulations.
    Xia X; Liu Y; Yu L; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):607-625. PubMed ID: 35708939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of font size and glare on computer tasks in young and older adults.
    Ko P; Mohapatra A; Bailey IL; Sheedy J; Rempel DM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Jun; 91(6):682-9. PubMed ID: 24830373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do effects of visual contrast and font difficulty on readers' eye movements interact with effects of word frequency or predictability?
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1235-1251. PubMed ID: 32730070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.