447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32586040)
1. Results of a Mass Media Campaign in South Africa to Promote a Sugary Drinks Tax.
Murukutla N; Cotter T; Wang S; Cullinan K; Gaston F; Kotov A; Maharjan M; Mullin S
Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32586040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How the "Are We Drinking Ourselves Sick?" Communication Campaign Built Support for Policy Action on Sugary Drinks in Jamaica.
Christian D; Maharjan M; Kotov A; Cotter T; Mullin S; Nurse V; McGaw B; Chen D; Puri P; Wang S; Negi NS; Murukutla N
Nutrients; 2022 Jul; 14(14):. PubMed ID: 35889823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ability of a mass media campaign to influence knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors about sugary drinks and obesity.
Boles M; Adams A; Gredler A; Manhas S
Prev Med; 2014 Oct; 67 Suppl 1():S40-5. PubMed ID: 25066020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are Australians ready for warning labels, marketing bans and sugary drink taxes? Two cross-sectional surveys measuring support for policy responses to sugar-sweetened beverages.
Miller CL; Dono J; Wakefield MA; Pettigrew S; Coveney J; Roder D; Durkin SJ; Wittert G; Martin J; Ettridge KA
BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e027962. PubMed ID: 31248926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are intentions to change, policy awareness, or health knowledge related to changes in dietary intake following a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in South Africa? A before-and-after study.
Essman M; Zimmer C; Carpentier FD; Swart EC; Taillie LS
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2022 Oct; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 36307849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The equitable impact of sugary drink taxation structures on sugary drink consumption among Canadians: a modelling study using the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition.
Smith BT; Warren CM; Anderson LN; Hammond D; Manuel DG; Li Y; Andreacchi AT; Rosella LC; Fu SH; Hobin E
Public Health Nutr; 2024 Apr; 27(1):e121. PubMed ID: 38618932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Instrumental Role of Strategic Communication to Counter Industry Marketing Responses to Sugary Drink Taxes Comment on "Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019".
Murukutla N; Cotter T; Kotov A
Int J Health Policy Manag; 2023; 12():7685. PubMed ID: 37579428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Controlled cohort evaluation of the
Morley BC; Niven PH; Dixon HG; Swanson MG; McAleese AB; Wakefield MA
BMJ Open; 2018 Apr; 8(4):e019574. PubMed ID: 29695387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The health and financial impacts of a sugary drink tax across different income groups in Canada.
Kao KE; Jones AC; Ohinmaa A; Paulden M
Econ Hum Biol; 2020 Aug; 38():100869. PubMed ID: 32442926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can point-of-sale nutrition information and health warnings encourage reduced preference for sugary drinks?: An experimental study.
Scully M; Morley B; Wakefield M; Dixon H
Appetite; 2020 Jun; 149():104612. PubMed ID: 31981587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of the LiveLighter mass media campaign with consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages: Cohort study.
Morley B; Niven P; Dixon H; Swanson M; Szybiak M; Shilton T; Pratt IS; Slevin T; Wakefield M
Health Promot J Austr; 2019 Dec; 30 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):34-42. PubMed ID: 30903631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Price impact of taxes on sugary drinks in Brazil.
Pereda P; Garcia CP
Econ Hum Biol; 2020 Dec; 39():100898. PubMed ID: 32622931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attitudes and perceptions among urban South Africans towards sugar-sweetened beverages and taxation.
Bosire EN; Stacey N; Mukoma G; Tugendhaft A; Hofman K; Norris SA
Public Health Nutr; 2020 Feb; 23(2):374-383. PubMed ID: 31179956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Potential impact of the adult-targeted LiveLighter "Sugary Drinks" campaign on adolescent consumption: Findings from a national cross-sectional school survey.
Gascoyne C; Scully M; Wakefield M; Morley B
Health Promot J Austr; 2023 Oct; 34(4):759-764. PubMed ID: 36727405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sugary beverage taxation in South Africa: Household expenditure, demand system elasticities, and policy implications.
Stacey N; Tugendhaft A; Hofman K
Prev Med; 2017 Dec; 105S(Suppl):S26-S31. PubMed ID: 28579502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examining the news media reaction to a national sugary beverage tax in South Africa: a quantitative content analysis.
Essman M; Stoltze FM; Carpentier FD; Swart EC; Taillie LS
BMC Public Health; 2021 Mar; 21(1):454. PubMed ID: 33676468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reducing sugary drink consumption: New York City's approach.
Kansagra SM; Kennelly MO; Nonas CA; Curtis CJ; Van Wye G; Goodman A; Farley TA
Am J Public Health; 2015 Apr; 105(4):e61-4. PubMed ID: 25713971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Retrospection and reflection on international progress of sugar-sweetened beverages tax policies].
Liu D; Zhai Y; Zhao WH
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 51(12):1124-1128. PubMed ID: 29262497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: results from a 2011 national public opinion survey.
Barry CL; Niederdeppe J; Gollust SE
Am J Prev Med; 2013 Feb; 44(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 23332333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of the San Francisco, CA, Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Health Warning on Consumer Reactions: Implications for Equity from a Randomized Experiment.
Grummon AH; Reimold AE; Hall MG
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2022 Feb; 122(2):363-370.e6. PubMed ID: 34465443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
