145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32586769)
1. Low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor are sufficient for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Keklik M; Karakus E; Kaynar L; Akyol G; Guven ZT; Celik S; Baydar M; Sanlı N; Unal A; Cetin M
Transfus Apher Sci; 2020 Oct; 59(5):102844. PubMed ID: 32586769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Lin TL; Wang PN; Kuo MC; Hung YH; Chang H; Tang TC
J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26340986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel induction therapies.
Hamadani M; Kochuparambil ST; Osman S; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Bunner P; Watkins K; Morrison D; Speir E; Deremer D; Kota V; Jillella A; Craig M; Awan F
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Jul; 18(7):1128-35. PubMed ID: 22248715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for multiple myeloma.
Shimura Y; Kuroda J; Uchiyama H; Kawata-Iida E; Tsutsumi Y; Nagoshi H; Mizutani S; Yamamoto-Sugitani M; Matsumoto Y; Kobayashi T; Horiike S; Shimazaki C; Kaneko H; Kobayashi Y; Taniwaki M
J Clin Apher; 2013 Oct; 28(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 23804501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide versus Intermediate-High-Dose Cyclophosphamide versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Alone for Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Zannetti BA; Saraceni F; Cellini C; Fabbri E; Monaco F; Guarini A; Laszlo D; Martino M; Olivieri A; Imola M; Tosi P; Chiarucci M; Zuffa E; Lanza F
Transplant Cell Ther; 2021 Mar; 27(3):244.e1-244.e8. PubMed ID: 33781522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intermediate-dose CY and G-CSF more efficiently mobilize adequate numbers of PBSC for tandem autologous PBSC transplantation compared with low-dose CY in patients with multiple myeloma.
Hiwase DK; Bollard G; Hiwase S; Bailey M; Muirhead J; Schwarer AP
Cytotherapy; 2007; 9(6):539-47. PubMed ID: 17882718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.
Chaudhary L; Awan F; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Tse W; Craig M; Hamadani M
J Clin Apher; 2013 Oct; 28(5):359-67. PubMed ID: 23765597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cyclophosphamide-based hematopoietic stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Tuchman SA; Bacon WA; Huang LW; Long G; Rizzieri D; Horwitz M; Chute JP; Sullivan K; Morris Engemann A; Yopp A; Li Z; Corbet K; Chao N; Gasparetto C
J Clin Apher; 2015 Jun; 30(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 25293363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of chemo-free strategy with G-CSF plus plerixafor on demand versus intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF as PBSC mobilization in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: An Italian explorative cost Analysis.
Laszlo D; Marcacci GP; Martino M; Radice D; Rabascio C; Lucchetti B; Magarò A; Caime A; Menna S; Lionetti MT; Bertolini F
Transfus Apher Sci; 2020 Oct; 59(5):102819. PubMed ID: 32499108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparable efficacy and lower cost of PBSC mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF compared with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies.
Awan F; Kochuparambil ST; Falconer DE; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Watkins K; Deremer D; Jillella A; Craig M; Hamadani M
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2013 Oct; 48(10):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23584435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Higher efficacy of intermediate dose cytarabine + G-CSF compared to cyclophosphamide + G-CSF in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Bogucka-Fedorczuk A; Czyz A; Kalicińska E; Sawicki M; Laszkowska-Lewko M; Wicherska-Pawłowska K; Rybka J; Szeremet A; Prajs I; Szymczak D; Wróbel T
J Clin Apher; 2020 Aug; 35(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 32298020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of Plerixafor or Cyclophosphamide Combined with G-CSF in Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Multiple Myeloma].
Li WT; Ma LM; Lian Y; Wang QG; Gao ZJ; Zhao S
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Oct; 31(5):1403-1409. PubMed ID: 37846691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of stem cell mobilization regimen on lymphocyte collection yield in patients with multiple myeloma.
Hiwase DK; Hiwase S; Bailey M; Bollard G; Schwarer AP
Cytotherapy; 2008; 10(5):507-17. PubMed ID: 18608354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-dose or intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for progenitor cell mobilisation in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jantunen E; Putkonen M; Nousiainen T; Pelliniemi TT; Mahlamäki E; Remes K
Bone Marrow Transplant; 2003 Mar; 31(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 12634725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide, sequential granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, and scheduled commencement of leukapheresis in 225 patients undergoing autologous transplantation.
Bashey A; Donohue M; Liu L; Medina B; Corringham S; Ihasz A; Carrier E; Castro JE; Holman PR; Xu R; Law P; Ball ED; Lane TA
Transfusion; 2007 Nov; 47(11):2153-60. PubMed ID: 17958545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.
Koç ON; Gerson SL; Cooper BW; Laughlin M; Meyerson H; Kutteh L; Fox RM; Szekely EM; Tainer N; Lazarus HM
J Clin Oncol; 2000 May; 18(9):1824-30. PubMed ID: 10784622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-dose etoposide is an effective and safe protocol for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Park Y; Kim DS; Jeon MJ; Lee BH; Yu ES; Kang KW; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Nam MH; Yoon SY; Choi CW; Kang ES; Cho D; Kim K; Kim BS; Kim DW; Kim SJ
J Clin Apher; 2019 Oct; 34(5):579-588. PubMed ID: 31283042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells for autografting with low-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Bellido M; Sureda A; Martino R; Madoz P; García J; Brunet S
Haematologica; 1998 May; 83(5):428-31. PubMed ID: 9658727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of gradual increment in rhG-CSF dose on stem cell yields in patients with multiple myeloma mobilized with intermediate dose cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF.
Hacıoğlu S; Sarı I; Doğu MH; Keskin A
Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Feb; 50(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 24342458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
