These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32587226)

  • 1. Comments on: Using corneal graft from keratoconic donor for lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Agarwal M; Natarajan R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 68(7):1505-1506. PubMed ID: 32587226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response to comments on: Using corneal graft from keratoconic donor for lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Kymionis GD; Grentzelos MA
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jul; 68(7):1506. PubMed ID: 32587227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using corneal graft from keratoconic donor for lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Kymionis GD; Tabibian D; Voulgari N; Fabro F; Grentzelos MA
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 68(1):226-229. PubMed ID: 31856533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Small, overlapping tectonic keratoplasty involving graft-host junction of penetrating keratoplasty.
    Soong HK; Meyer RF; Sugar A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Apr; 129(4):465-7. PubMed ID: 10764854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of new lamellar techniques of keratoplasty on eye bank activity.
    Muraine M; Toubeau D; Gueudry J; Brasseur G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 245(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 16900356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trends in Corneal Transplantation from 2001 to 2016 in Germany: A Report of the DOG-Section Cornea and its Keratoplasty Registry.
    Flockerzi E; Maier P; Böhringer D; Reinshagen H; Kruse F; Cursiefen C; Reinhard T; Geerling G; Torun N; Seitz B;
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 188():91-98. PubMed ID: 29410297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Granular corneal dystrophy. Visual results and pattern of recurrence after lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty.
    Lyons CJ; McCartney AC; Kirkness CM; Ficker LA; Steele AD; Rice NS
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Nov; 101(11):1812-7. PubMed ID: 7800362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in corneal transplantation in a single center in Barcelona, Spain. Transitioning to DMEK.
    Palma-Carvajal F; Morales P; Salazar-Villegas A; Figueroa-Vercellino JP; Spencer F; Peraza-Nieves J; Sabater N; Torras J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2020 Jan; 43(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 31831273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Penetrating keratoplasty in the Singapore National Eye Centre and donor cornea acquisition in the Singapore Eye Bank.
    Chan CM; Wong TY; Yeong SM; Lim TH; Tan DT
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1997 Jul; 26(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 9395797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in penetrating and anterior lamellar corneal grafting techniques for keratoconus: a national registry study.
    Godefrooij DA; Gans R; Imhof SM; Wisse RP
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 27061780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicted long-term outcome of corneal transplantation.
    Borderie VM; Boëlle PY; Touzeau O; Allouch C; Boutboul S; Laroche L
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Dec; 116(12):2354-60. PubMed ID: 19815285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immune reactions after modern lamellar (DALK, DSAEK, DMEK) versus conventional penetrating corneal transplantation.
    Hos D; Matthaei M; Bock F; Maruyama K; Notara M; Clahsen T; Hou Y; Le VNH; Salabarria AC; Horstmann J; Bachmann BO; Cursiefen C
    Prog Retin Eye Res; 2019 Nov; 73():100768. PubMed ID: 31279005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Methods of preserving donor corneas].
    Voronin GV; Osipyan GA; Trufanov SV; Budnikova EA; Rozinova VN; Subbot AM; Makarova MA
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2018; 134(5. Vyp. 2):238-243. PubMed ID: 30499523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Donor-to-host transmission of infection: contrasting outcomes of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.
    Busin M; Giannaccare G; Myerscough J; Bovone C; Scorcia V; Campos EC
    Transpl Int; 2020 Apr; 33(4):462-464. PubMed ID: 31958168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Australian Corneal Graft Registry. 1990 to 1992 report.
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 21(2 Suppl):1-48. PubMed ID: 8333942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limitations of Keratoplasty in China: A Survey Analysis.
    Hong J; Shi W; Liu Z; Pineda R; Cui X; Sun X; Xu J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132268. PubMed ID: 26161870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lamellar keratoplasty. Technique and results: Comparative study with penetrating keratoplasties and keratectomies.
    CASTROVIEJO R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1950 Dec; 33(12):1850-62. PubMed ID: 14789935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Prerequisites for the use of preserved donor tissue in perforating and lamellar keratoplasty].
    Draeger J; Böhnke M; Kohlhaas M; Engelmann K
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 May; 200(5):392-4. PubMed ID: 1614108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Corneal sensitivity in keratoconus after penetrating and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
    Ceccuzzi R; Zanardi A; Fiorentino A; Tinelli C; Bianchi PE
    Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(4):247-50. PubMed ID: 20110740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Lamellar keratoplasty; comparative study of perforating keratoplasties and keratectomies].
    CASTROVIEJO R
    Ann Ocul (Paris); 1950 Aug; 183(8):641-59. PubMed ID: 14771666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.