169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32587784)
1. Validation of the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma initially receiving chemoradiotherapy and proposal of modifications.
Zhu X; Chen D; Cao Y; Zhao X; Ju X; Shen Y; Cao F; Qing S; Fang F; Jia Z; Zhang H
Cancer Biol Med; 2020 May; 17(2):492-500. PubMed ID: 32587784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer.
van Roessel S; Kasumova GG; Verheij J; Najarian RM; Maggino L; de Pastena M; Malleo G; Marchegiani G; Salvia R; Ng SC; de Geus SW; Lof S; Giovinazzo F; van Dam JL; Kent TS; Busch OR; van Eijck CH; Koerkamp BG; Abu Hilal M; Bassi C; Tseng JF; Besselink MG
JAMA Surg; 2018 Dec; 153(12):e183617. PubMed ID: 30285076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the prognostic value of the new AJCC 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma; a need to subclassify stage III?
Song M; Yoon SB; Lee IS; Hong TH; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Lee MA; Jung ES; Choi MG
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():62-69. PubMed ID: 30326370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Eighth AJCC New Substages for Bladder Cancer Among Different Staging Contexts.
Abdel-Rahman O
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Dec; 15(6):e1095-e1106. PubMed ID: 28843376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the 8th AJCC staging system for pathologically versus clinically staged pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A time to revisit a dogma?
Abdel-Rahman O
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2018 Feb; 17(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 29428107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
Liu C; Cheng H; Jin K; Guo M; Lu Y; Wang Z; Yang C; Long J; Ni Q; Yu X; Luo G
Pancreas; 2018 Jul; 47(6):742-747. PubMed ID: 29851752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Staging System for Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Analysis.
Kamarajah SK; Burns WR; Frankel TL; Cho CS; Nathan H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):2023-2030. PubMed ID: 28213792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Projecting Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Editions of the American Joint Commission on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control Staging Systems in Two Contemporary National Patient Cohorts.
Pontius LN; Oyekunle TO; Thomas SM; Stang MT; Scheri RP; Roman SA; Sosa JA
Thyroid; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1408-1416. PubMed ID: 28891405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mesenterico-portal vein invasion should be an important factor in TNM staging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Proposed modification of the 8
Chen HY; Wang X; Zhang H; Liu XB; Tan CL
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(46):6752-6766. PubMed ID: 31857777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation.
Fang C; Wang W; Deng JY; Sun Z; Seeruttun SR; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Liang H; Zhou ZW
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Nov; 38(1):67. PubMed ID: 30454049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition staging system in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a US population-based study.
Zhang G; Li R; Zhao X; Meng S; Ye J; Zhao L
J Surg Res; 2018 Feb; 222():55-68. PubMed ID: 29273376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between the seventh and eighth edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer integrated with pretreatment plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA level in a non-Chinese population: secondary analysis from a prospective randomized trial.
Kitpanit S; Jittapiromsak N; Sriyook A; Prayongrat A; Kannarunimit D; Chakkabat C; Lertbutsayanukul C
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Dec; 49(12):1100-1113. PubMed ID: 31334768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stage III should be subclassified into Stage IIIA and IIIB in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (8
Yu HF; Zhao BQ; Li YC; Fu J; Jiang W; Xu RW; Yang HC; Zhang XJ
World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 24(22):2400-2405. PubMed ID: 29904247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel scoring system predicts postsurgical survival and adjuvant chemotherapeutic benefits in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Implications for AJCC-TNM staging.
Liu L; Xu HX; He M; Wang W; Wang WQ; Wu CT; Wei RQ; Liang Y; Gao HL; Liu C; Xu J; Long J; Ni QX; Shao CH; Wang J; Yu XJ
Surgery; 2018 Jun; 163(6):1280-1294. PubMed ID: 29548773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating the eighth edition TNM staging system for esophageal cancer among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy: A SEER study.
Yuan Y; Ma G; Hu X; Huang Q
Cancer Med; 2020 Jul; 9(13):4648-4655. PubMed ID: 32391623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proposed Modification of the 8th Edition of the AJCC Staging System for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Shi S; Hua J; Liang C; Meng Q; Liang D; Xu J; Ni Q; Yu X
Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):944-950. PubMed ID: 29334560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the eighth clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer stage grouping for esophageal cancer.
Oweira H; Schmidt J; Mehrabi A; Kulaksiz H; Schneider P; Schöb O; Giryes A; Abdel-Rahman O
Future Oncol; 2018 Jan; 14(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 29235888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Challenging a dogma; AJCC 8th staging system is not sufficient to predict outcomes of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Abdel-Rahman O
Lung Cancer; 2017 Nov; 113():128-133. PubMed ID: 29110839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimized modification of the eighth edition of AJCC TNM staging system for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Pu N; Yin L; Habib JR; Gao S; Hu H; Zhu Y; Wu Y; Yu J; Lou W
Future Oncol; 2019 Oct; 15(30):3457-3465. PubMed ID: 31460788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Revisiting Dukes' paradigm; some node positive colon cancer patients have better prognosis than some node negative patients.
Abdel-Rahman O
Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Jun; 20(6):794-800. PubMed ID: 29086248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
