These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32587862)

  • 1. Comparison of Hemodynamic Support by Impella vs. Peripheral Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Porcine Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Nix C; Ishikawa K; Meyns B; Yasuda S; Adriaenssens T; Barth S; Zayat R; Leprince P; Lebreton G
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2020; 7():99. PubMed ID: 32587862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemodynamics with mechanical circulatory support devices using a cardiogenic shock model.
    Yahagi K; Nishimura G; Kuramoto K; Tsuboko Y; Iwasaki K
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14125. PubMed ID: 38898087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impella CP or VA-ECMO in profound cardiogenic shock: left ventricular unloading and organ perfusion in a large animal model.
    Møller-Helgestad OK; Hyldebrandt JA; Banke A; Rud CS; Udesen NLJ; Linde L; Okkels-Jensen L; Schmidt H; Ravn HB; Møller JE
    EuroIntervention; 2019 Feb; 14(15):e1585-e1592. PubMed ID: 30418160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rationale and Design of JenaMACS-Acute Hemodynamic Impact of Ventricular Unloading Using the Impella CP Assist Device in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock.
    Haertel F; Lenk K; Fritzenwanger M; Pfeifer R; Franz M; Memisevic N; Otto S; Lauer B; Weingärtner O; Kretzschmar D; Dannberg G; Westphal J; Baez L; Bogoviku J; Schulze PC; Moebius-Winkler S
    J Clin Med; 2022 Aug; 11(15):. PubMed ID: 35956238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.
    Karami M; den Uil CA; Ouweneel DM; Scholte NT; Engström AE; Akin S; Lagrand WK; Vlaar AP; Jewbali LS; Henriques JP
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):164-172. PubMed ID: 31353918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ECMO and Impella Support Strategies as a Bridge to Surgical Repair of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture.
    Coyan G; Anand N; Imran M; Gomez H; Ramanan R; Murray H; Sanon S; Yoon P; Kaczorowski D; Bonatti J
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Apr; 58(5):. PubMed ID: 35630028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal life support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: surgical venting versus Impella device.
    Radakovic D; Zittermann A; Knezevic A; Razumov A; Opacic D; Wienrautner N; Flottmann C; Rojas SV; Fox H; Schramm R; Morshuis M; Rudolph V; Gummert J; Deutsch MA
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2022 Jan; 34(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 34999807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Device profile of the Impella 5.0 and 5.5 system for mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock: overview of its safety and efficacy.
    Pahuja M; Hernandez-Montfort J; Whitehead EH; Kawabori M; Kapur NK
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Jan; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34894975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Hemodynamic Effects of Contemporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in a Porcine Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Weil BR; Konecny F; Suzuki G; Iyer V; Canty JM
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 9(22):2292-2303. PubMed ID: 28026740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of concomitant vasoactive treatment and mechanical left ventricular unloading in a porcine model of profound cardiogenic shock.
    Udesen NLJ; Helgestad OKL; Banke ABS; Frederiksen PH; Josiassen J; Jensen LO; Schmidt H; Edelman ER; Chang BY; Ravn HB; Møller JE
    Crit Care; 2020 Mar; 24(1):95. PubMed ID: 32188462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concomitant implantation of Impella
    Pappalardo F; Schulte C; Pieri M; Schrage B; Contri R; Soeffker G; Greco T; Lembo R; Müllerleile K; Colombo A; Sydow K; De Bonis M; Wagner F; Reichenspurner H; Blankenberg S; Zangrillo A; Westermann D
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2017 Mar; 19(3):404-412. PubMed ID: 27709750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Circulatory Support with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and/or Impella for Cardiogenic Shock During Myocardial Infarction.
    Mourad M; Gaudard P; De La Arena P; Eliet J; Zeroual N; Rouvière P; Roubille F; Albat B; Colson PH
    ASAIO J; 2018; 64(6):708-714. PubMed ID: 29240628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impella versus Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Batchelor RJ; Wheelahan A; Zheng WC; Stub D; Yang Y; Chan W
    J Clin Med; 2022 Jul; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 35887718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Left ventricular mechanical support with Impella provides more ventricular unloading in heart failure than extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
    Kawashima D; Gojo S; Nishimura T; Itoda Y; Kitahori K; Motomura N; Morota T; Murakami A; Takamoto S; Kyo S; Ono M
    ASAIO J; 2011; 57(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 21317769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of left ventricular unloading using a peripheral Impella®-pump in eCPR patients.
    Gaisendrees C; Djordjevic I; Sabashnikov A; Adler C; Eghbalzadeh K; Ivanov B; Walter S; Schlachtenberger G; Merkle-Storms J; Gerfer S; Carstens H; Deppe AC; Kuhn E; Wahlers T
    Artif Organs; 2022 Mar; 46(3):451-459. PubMed ID: 34516014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined pulmonary and left ventricular support with veno-pulmonary ECMO and impella 5.0 for cardiogenic shock after coronary surgery.
    Sayed S; Schimmer C; Shade I; Leyh R; Aleksic I
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 May; 12(1):38. PubMed ID: 28532425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discussion of hemodynamic optimization strategies and the canonical understanding of hemodynamics during biventricular mechanical support in cardiogenic shock: does the flow balance make the difference?
    Patsalis N; Kreutz J; Chatzis G; Fichera CF; Syntila S; Choukeir M; Griewing S; Schieffer B; Markus B
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2024 Apr; 113(4):602-611. PubMed ID: 38261027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Haemodynamic implications of VA-ECMO vs. VA-ECMO plus Impella CP for cardiogenic shock in a large animal model.
    Frederiksen PH; Linde L; Gregers E; Udesen NLJ; Helgestad OK; Banke A; Dahl JS; Jensen LO; Lassen JF; Povlsen AL; Larsen JP; Schmidt H; Ravn HB; Møller JE
    ESC Heart Fail; 2024 Aug; 11(4):2305-2313. PubMed ID: 38649295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Successful weaning from veno-arterial ECMO and Impella2.5 by veno-venous and arterial ECMO (v-ECPELLA) for a patient with acute myocardial infarction complicated by severe lung injury.
    Shimizu S; Shimano M; Shibata Y; Hanaki Y; Kamiya H; Morimoto R; Okumura T; Murohara T
    J Cardiol Cases; 2020 Sep; 22(3):103-106. PubMed ID: 32884588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impella as unloading strategy during VA-ECMO: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fiorelli F; Panoulas V
    Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2021 Dec; 22(4):1503-1511. PubMed ID: 34957789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.