These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32588169)

  • 1. Auditory performance of post-lingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients using electrode deactivation based on postoperative cone beam CT images.
    Danieli F; Dermacy T; do Amaral MSA; Reis ACMB; Gnansia D; Hyppolito MA
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Apr; 278(4):977-986. PubMed ID: 32588169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results of Postoperative, CT-based, Electrode Deactivation on Hearing in Prelingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Labadie RF; Noble JH; Hedley-Williams AJ; Sunderhaus LW; Dawant BM; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 26719955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
    Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients: An analysis of ceiling effects in the CUNY sentence test (Quiet) in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.
    Ebrahimi-Madiseh A; Eikelboom RH; Jayakody DM; Atlas MD
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016; 17(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 26841858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
    Hiraumi H; Tsuji J; Kanemaru S; Fujino K; Ito J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.
    van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of electrode deactivation on speech recognition in multichannel cochlear implant recipients.
    Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Nov; 18(6):324-334. PubMed ID: 28793847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting.
    Gani M; Valentini G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Boëx C
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 17216585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrode discrimination by early-deafened subjects using the cochlear limited multiple-electrode cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Clark GM
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):291-304. PubMed ID: 10981605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear implantation in early deafened, late implanted adults: Do they benefit?
    Kumar RS; Mawman D; Sankaran D; Melling C; O'Driscoll M; Freeman SM; Lloyd SK
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():22-5. PubMed ID: 27099106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the performance of post-lingually deafened patients with Nurotron(®) Venus™ cochlear implants.
    Li J; Ji F; Chen W; Zhao H; Han D; Yang S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jun; 134(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 24720340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 25658746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory training for adults with cochlear implants: a systematic review.
    Cambridge G; Taylor T; Arnott W; Wilson WJ
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Nov; 61(11):896-904. PubMed ID: 35080191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D-localisation of cochlear implant electrode contacts in relation to anatomical structures from in vivo cone-beam computed tomography.
    Sismono F; Leblans M; Mancini L; Veneziano A; Zanini F; Dirckx J; Bernaerts A; de Foer B; Offeciers E; Zarowski A
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108537. PubMed ID: 35672191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association Between Flat-Panel Computed Tomographic Imaging-Guided Place-Pitch Mapping and Speech and Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jiam NT; Gilbert M; Cooke D; Jiradejvong P; Barrett K; Caldwell M; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Feb; 145(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 30477013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximizing Cochlear Implant Outcomes with Short-Term Aural Rehabilitation.
    Bernstein CM; Brewer DM; Bakke MH; Olson AD; Machmer EJ; Spitzer JB; Schauer PC; Sydlowski SA; Levitt H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):144-156. PubMed ID: 33890268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical use of electrode differentiation to enhance programming of cochlear implants.
    Saleh SM; Saeed SR; Meerton L; Moore DR; Vickers DA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S16-8. PubMed ID: 24533757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition with cochlear implants as a function of the number of channels: Effects of electrode placement.
    Berg KA; Noble JH; Dawant BM; Dwyer RT; Labadie RF; Gifford RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3646. PubMed ID: 32486813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.