These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Obesity is associated with an increased rate of incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery. Burks CA; Werner BC; Yang S; Shimer AL Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):500-4. PubMed ID: 25599288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidental Durotomy in Open Versus Tubular Revision Microdiscectomy: A Retrospective Controlled Study on Incidence, Management, and Outcome. Kogias E; Klingler JH; Franco Jimenez P; Vasilikos I; Sircar R; Scholz C; Hubbe U Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1333-E1337. PubMed ID: 29176490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques: Open TLIF Versus Wiltse MIS TLIF. Ge DH; Stekas ND; Varlotta CG; Fischer CR; Petrizzo A; Protopsaltis TS; Passias PG; Errico TJ; Buckland AJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 May; 44(9):E555-E560. PubMed ID: 30325884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidental durotomy during spine surgery: incidence, management and complications. A retrospective review. Guerin P; El Fegoun AB; Obeid I; Gille O; Lelong L; Luc S; Bourghli A; Cursolle JC; Pointillart V; Vital JM Injury; 2012 Apr; 43(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 21251652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perioperative complications related to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion: evaluation of 204 operations on lumbar instability at single center. Wang J; Zhou Y Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2078-84. PubMed ID: 24361997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of incidental durotomy in minimally invasive spine surgery. Ruban D; O'Toole JE Neurosurg Focus; 2011 Oct; 31(4):E15. PubMed ID: 21961859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postoperative management of incidental durotomy in minimally invasive lumbar spinal surgery. Than KD; Wang AC; Etame AB; La Marca F; Park P Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Oct; 51(5):263-6. PubMed ID: 18855289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature. Vazan M; Gempt J; Meyer B; Buchmann N; Ryang YM Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2017 Jun; 159(6):1137-1146. PubMed ID: 28160064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature. Joseph JR; Smith BW; La Marca F; Park P Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E4. PubMed ID: 26424344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the Wiltse versus midline approaches in degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine. Street JT; Andrew Glennie R; Dea N; DiPaola C; Wang Z; Boyd M; Paquette SJ; Kwon BK; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 27104286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence of graft extrusion following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Bakhsheshian J; Khanna R; Choy W; Lawton CD; Nixon AT; Wong AP; Koski TR; Liu JC; Song JK; Dahdaleh NS; Smith ZA; Fessler RG J Clin Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 24():88-93. PubMed ID: 26578209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]