These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32589353)

  • 1. Evaluation of the accuracy of electronic apex locators, cone-beam computed tomography, and radiovisiography in primary teeth: An in vitro study.
    Kayabasi M; Oznurhan F
    Microsc Res Tech; 2020 Nov; 83(11):1330-1335. PubMed ID: 32589353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In Vitro Comparison of the Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scanning and Electronic Apex Locators in Detection of Simulated Root Perforations in Different Localizations.
    Harorlı H; Koç S; Kuştarcı A
    J Endod; 2023 Dec; 49(12):1676-1681. PubMed ID: 37739340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of working length measurement: electronic apex locator versus cone-beam computed tomography.
    Lucena C; López JM; Martín JA; Robles V; González-Rodríguez MP
    Int Endod J; 2014 Mar; 47(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 23772839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study.
    Kaufman AY; Keila S; Yoshpe M
    Int Endod J; 2002 Feb; 35(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 11843975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and electronic apex locator for root canal length determination in primary teeth.
    Ghule KD; Naik S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(2):157-161. PubMed ID: 31249179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of Root Canal Length Up to Perforation Area Using Different Electronic Apex Locators and CBCT Images Obtained at Different Voxel Sizes: A Comparative Ex Vivo Study.
    Uğur Aydin Z; Göller Bulut D
    Chin J Dent Res; 2021 Apr; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 33890455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are electronic apex locators accurate in determining working length in primary teeth pulpectomies? A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.
    Vitali FC; Santos PS; Cardoso M; Massignan C; Garcia LDFR; Bortoluzzi EA; Teixeira CDS
    Int Endod J; 2022 Oct; 55(10):989-1009. PubMed ID: 35808837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of two different apex locators in primary teeth with and without root resorption.
    Bodur H; Odabaş M; Tulunoğlu O; Tinaz AC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Jun; 12(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 18027005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Radiography, Radiovisiography, and an Electronic Apex Locator in Determining the Working Length in Primary Teeth.
    Kumar LV; Sreelakshmi N; Reddy ER; Manjula M; Rani ST; Rajesh A
    Pediatr Dent; 2016; 38(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 26892213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of electronic apex locators in primary teeth: a meta-analysis.
    Ahmad IA; Pani SC
    Int Endod J; 2015 Mar; 48(3):298-307. PubMed ID: 24863852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: an ex vivo study.
    Mancini M; Felici R; Conte G; Costantini M; Cianconi L
    J Endod; 2011 May; 37(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 21496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Formulating a regression equation for determination of working length in primary molars using apex locators: a clinical study.
    Dandempally A; Muppa R; Duddu MK; Bhupatiraju P; Nallanchakrava S
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2013 Dec; 14(6):369-74. PubMed ID: 23775591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro evaluation of three electronic apex locators using conventional methods and cone beam computed tomography.
    Mrasori S; Budina R; Dragidella F
    Minerva Stomatol; 2014; 63(7-8):259-66. PubMed ID: 25299360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Use of Micro-Computed Tomography to Determine the Accuracy of 2 Electronic Apex Locators and Anatomic Variations Affecting Their Precision.
    Piasecki L; Carneiro E; da Silva Neto UX; Westphalen VP; Brandão CG; Gambarini G; Azim AA
    J Endod; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1263-7. PubMed ID: 27291503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of micro-computed tomography to determine the accuracy of electronic working length with two apex locators.
    Suguro H; Nishihara A; Tamura T; Nakamura T; Toyama Y; Takeichi O
    J Oral Sci; 2021 Mar; 63(2):167-169. PubMed ID: 33731504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Root canal length estimated by cone-beam computed tomography at different slice thicknesses, dedicated endodontic software, or measured by an electronic apex locator.
    Pham VK; Pham TL
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6531. PubMed ID: 35444163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Open Apex on Working Length Determination Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Apex Locators: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
    Srivastava S; Alharbi HM; Soliman M; Eldwakhly E; Abdelhafeez MM
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():3811983. PubMed ID: 35915800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endodontic length measurements using 3D Endo, cone-beam computed tomography, and electronic apex locator.
    Van Pham K
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):271. PubMed ID: 34006262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of two electronic apex locators in primary teeth with and without apical resorption: a laboratory study.
    Tosun G; Erdemir A; Eldeniz AU; Sermet U; Sener Y
    Int Endod J; 2008 May; 41(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 18312377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Root canal length determination by different methods in primary teeth: an in vivo study.
    Wankhade AD; Kumar R; Singh RK; Chandra A
    Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(2):E38-42. PubMed ID: 23635968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.