240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32590359)
1. Robust radiobiological optimization of ion beam therapy utilizing Monte Carlo and microdosimetric kinetic model.
Ma J; Wan Chan Tseung HS; Courneyea L; Beltran C; Herman MG; Remmes NB
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jul; 65(15):155020. PubMed ID: 32590359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lateral variations of radiobiological properties of therapeutic fields of
Dewey S; Burigo L; Pshenichnov I; Mishustin I; Bleicher M
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):5884-5907. PubMed ID: 28557800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extension of matRad with a modified microdosimetric kinetic model for carbon ion treatment planning: Comparison with Monte Carlo calculation.
Yoon E; Kim JI; Park JM; Choi CH; Jung S
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5884-5896. PubMed ID: 37162309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of Monte Carlo particle transport parameters and validation of a novel high throughput experimental setup to measure the biological effects of particle beams.
Patel D; Bronk L; Guan F; Peeler CR; Brons S; Dokic I; Abdollahi A; Rittmüller C; Jäkel O; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Titt U
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):6061-6073. PubMed ID: 28880368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Monte Carlo approach to the microdosimetric kinetic model to account for dose rate time structure effects in ion beam therapy with application in treatment planning simulations.
Manganaro L; Russo G; Cirio R; Dalmasso F; Giordanengo S; Monaco V; Muraro S; Sacchi R; Vignati A; Attili A
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1577-1589. PubMed ID: 28130821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of Geant4 for silicon microdosimetry in heavy ion therapy.
Bolst D; Guatelli S; Tran LT; Chartier L; Davis J; Biasi G; Prokopovich DA; Pogossov A; Reinhard MI; Petasecca M; Lerch MLF; Matsufuji N; Povoli M; Summanwar A; Kok A; Jackson M; Rosenfeld AB
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(4):045014. PubMed ID: 31739291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical dose assessment for scanned carbon-ion radiotherapy using linear energy transfer measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.
Nakaji T; Kanai T; Takashina M; Matsumura A; Osaki K; Yagi M; Tsubouchi T; Hamatani N; Ogawa K
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Dec; 67(24):. PubMed ID: 36327456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncertainty in tissue equivalent proportional counter assessments of microdosimetry and RBE estimates in carbon radiotherapy.
Hartzell S; Guan F; Taylor P; Peterson C; Taddei P; Kry S
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 66(15):. PubMed ID: 34252894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A mechanistic relative biological effectiveness model-based biological dose optimization for charged particle radiobiology studies.
Guan F; Geng C; Carlson DJ; Ma DH; Bronk L; Gates D; Wang X; Kry SF; Grosshans D; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Dec; 64(1):015008. PubMed ID: 30523805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrating microdosimetric
Cartechini G; Missiaggia M; Scifoni E; La Tessa C; Cordoni FG
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(4):. PubMed ID: 38211313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of linear energy transfer computed in a Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system.
Wagenaar D; Tran LT; Meijers A; Marmitt GG; Souris K; Bolst D; James B; Biasi G; Povoli M; Kok A; Traneus E; van Goethem MJ; Langendijk JA; Rosenfeld AB; Both S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(2):025006. PubMed ID: 31801119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the relative biological effectiveness of active-energy scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy on a commercial treatment planning system with a microdosimetic kinetic model.
Wang W; Sun W; Shen H; Zhao J
Radiat Oncol; 2023 May; 18(1):82. PubMed ID: 37198685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analytical probabilistic modeling of RBE-weighted dose for ion therapy.
Wieser HP; Hennig P; Wahl N; Bangert M
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(23):8959-8982. PubMed ID: 28980974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric accuracy and radiobiological implications of ion computed tomography for proton therapy treatment planning.
Meyer S; Kamp F; Tessonnier T; Mairani A; Belka C; Carlson DJ; Gianoli C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125008. PubMed ID: 30870831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing the modified microdosimetric kinetic model input parameters for proton and
Mairani A; Magro G; Tessonnier T; Böhlen TT; Molinelli S; Ferrari A; Parodi K; Debus J; Haberer T
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(11):N244-N256. PubMed ID: 28384125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using PENH.
Gomà C; Sterpin E
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 64(18):185009. PubMed ID: 31416054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calculating dose-averaged linear energy transfer in an analytical treatment planning system for carbon-ion radiotherapy.
Wang W; Li P; Shahnazi K; Wu X; Zhao J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 24(2):e13866. PubMed ID: 36527366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of spot scanning dose optimization and dose calculation for helium ions in Hyperion.
Fuchs H; Alber M; Schreiner T; Georg D
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5157-66. PubMed ID: 26328967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biophysical modeling and experimental validation of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for
Mein S; Dokic I; Klein C; Tessonnier T; Böhlen TT; Magro G; Bauer J; Ferrari A; Parodi K; Haberer T; Debus J; Abdollahi A; Mairani A
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jul; 14(1):123. PubMed ID: 31296232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
