156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32591573)
1. Use of longer sized screws is a salvage method for broken pedicles in osteoporotic vertebrae.
Hsieh MK; Liu MY; Chen JK; Tsai TT; Lai PL; Niu CC; Tai CL
Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10441. PubMed ID: 32591573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical study of the fixation stability of broken pedicle screws and subsequent strategies.
Hsieh MK; Liu MY; Chen JK; Tsai TT; Lai PL; Niu CC; Tai CL
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0219189. PubMed ID: 31251780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical Fixation Properties of the Cortical Bone Trajectory in the Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine.
Li HM; Zhang RJ; Gao H; Jia CY; Xing T; Zhang JX; Dong FL; Shen CL
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e717-e727. PubMed ID: 30092463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparative study of the stability of injectable pedicle screws with different lateral holes augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae.
Liu D; Sheng J; Luo Y; Huang C; Wu HH; Zhou JJ; Zhang XJ; Zheng W
Spine J; 2018 Sep; 18(9):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 29567517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: an experimental study.
Liu D; Zhang B; Xie QY; Kang X; Zhou JJ; Wang CR; Lei W; Zheng W
Spine J; 2016 Sep; 16(9):1124-32. PubMed ID: 27130374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical Investigation of a Novel Revision Device in an Osteoporotic Model: Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screw Anchor Versus Larger Screw Diameter.
Manon J; Hussain MM; Harris J; Moldavsky M; La Marca F; Bucklen BS
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):265-271. PubMed ID: 28632549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision of cannulated and perforated cement-augmented pedicle screws: a biomechanical study in human cadavers.
Bullmann V; Schmoelz W; Richter M; Grathwohl C; Schulte TL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E932-9. PubMed ID: 20508553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical properties of pedicle screw fixation augmented with allograft bone particles in osteoporotic vertebrae: different sizes and amounts.
Jia C; Zhang R; Xing T; Gao H; Li H; Dong F; Zhang J; Ge P; Song P; Xu P; Zhang H; Shen C
Spine J; 2019 Aug; 19(8):1443-1452. PubMed ID: 31009768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical study of injectable hollow pedicle screws for PMMA augmentation in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: effect of PMMA distribution and volume on screw stability.
Liu D; Sheng J; Wu HH; Kang X; Xie QY; Luo Y; Zhou JJ; Zheng W
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Dec; 29(6):639-646. PubMed ID: 30192220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis.
Yuan Q; Han X; Han X; He D; Liu B; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(26 Spec No.):B27-35. PubMed ID: 25504099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing.
Kueny RA; Kolb JP; Lehmann W; Püschel K; Morlock MM; Huber G
Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2196-202. PubMed ID: 25082759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical fixation properties of cortical versus transpedicular screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Sansur CA; Caffes NM; Ibrahimi DM; Pratt NL; Lewis EM; Murgatroyd AA; Cunningham BW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Oct; 25(4):467-476. PubMed ID: 27176113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of the pedicle screw insertion depth effect on screw stability under cyclic loading and subsequent pullout.
Karami KJ; Buckenmeyer LE; Kiapour AM; Kelkar PS; Goel VK; Demetropoulos CK; Soo TM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E133-9. PubMed ID: 25310387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Superior cortical screw in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: A biomechanics and microstructure-based study.
Yu T; Zhang X; Liu J; Li S; Shan Z; Fan S; Zhao F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Mar; 53():14-21. PubMed ID: 29407351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of pedicle screw diameter on screw fixation efficacy in human osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae.
Lai DM; Shih YT; Chen YH; Chien A; Wang JL
J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():196-203. PubMed ID: 29126607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines.
Becker S; Chavanne A; Spitaler R; Kropik K; Aigner N; Ogon M; Redl H
Eur Spine J; 2008 Nov; 17(11):1462-9. PubMed ID: 18781342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PMMA-augmentation of incompletely cannulated pedicle screws: a cadaver study to determine the benefits in the osteoporotic spine.
Goost H; Deborre C; Wirtz DC; Burger C; Prescher A; Fölsch C; Pflugmacher R; Kabir K
Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(4):607-15. PubMed ID: 24837053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision of the failed pedicle screw in osteoporotic lumbar spine: biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate augmentation.
Derinçek A; Türker M; Cinar M; Cetik O; Kalaycioğlu B
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2012; 23(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 22765490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
