These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32591842)

  • 1. The Impact of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Neck-Abdominal First Approach on the Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Hoshino A; Nakajima Y; Kawada K; Tokairin Y; Okada T; Matsui T; Yamaguchi K; Kawano T; Kinugasa Y
    World J Surg; 2020 Nov; 44(11):3829-3836. PubMed ID: 32591842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?
    Bjelovic M; Babic T; Spica B; Gunjic D; Veselinovic M; Trajkovic G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1196-201. PubMed ID: 27316602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy vs. Open Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Comparison.
    Vincke A; Miftode S; Alfarawan F; Bockhorn M; El-Sourani N
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Feb; 59(3):. PubMed ID: 36984435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health-related Quality of Life Following Hybrid Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Patients With Esophageal Cancer, Analysis of a Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Phase III Controlled Trial: The MIRO Trial.
    Mariette C; Markar S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Meunier B; Pezet D; Collet D; D'Journo XB; Brigand C; Perniceni T; Carrere N; Mabrut JY; Msika S; Peschaud F; Prudhomme M; Bonnetain F; Piessen G;
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jun; 271(6):1023-1029. PubMed ID: 31404005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recurrence and Survival After Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Ensure Study.
    Henckens SPG; Schuring N; Elliott JA; Johar A; Markar SR; Gantxegi A; Lagergren P; Hanna GB; Pera M; Reynolds JV; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS;
    Ann Surg; 2024 Aug; 280(2):267-273. PubMed ID: 38577796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer: Results of the MIRO Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nuytens F; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Meunier B; Gagnière J; Collet D; D'Journo XB; Brigand C; Perniceni T; Carrère N; Mabrut JY; Msika S; Peschaud F; Prudhomme M; Markar SR; Piessen G;
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Apr; 156(4):323-332. PubMed ID: 33595631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally Invasive
    Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Phased Implementation of Totally Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer after Previous Adoption of the Hybrid Minimally Invasive Technique: Results from a French Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Nuytens F; Lenne X; Clément G; Bruandet A; Eveno C; Piessen G
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 May; 29(5):2791-2801. PubMed ID: 34837133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Better Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Than Open Esophagectomy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.
    Terayama M; Okamura A; Kuriyama K; Takahashi N; Tamura M; Kanamori J; Imamura Y; Watanabe M
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Sep; 31(9):5748-5756. PubMed ID: 38896227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lasting symptoms and long-term health-related quality of life after totally minimally invasive, hybrid and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
    Eyck BM; Klevebro F; van der Wilk BJ; Johar A; Wijnhoven BPL; van Lanschot JJB; Lagergren P; Markar SR; Lagarde SM;
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 48(3):582-588. PubMed ID: 34763951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.
    Glatz T; Marjanovic G; Kulemann B; Sick O; Hopt UT; Hoeppner J
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2017 Mar; 402(2):323-331. PubMed ID: 28083680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
    Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer: Single Center Experience after 44 Consecutive Cases.
    Bjelović M; Babič T; Gunjić D; Veselinović M; Špica B
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(7-8):410-5. PubMed ID: 26506750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive surgical techniques for oesophageal cancer and nutritional recovery: a prospective population-based cohort study.
    Kauppila JH; Rosenlund H; Klevebro F; Johar A; Anandavadivelan P; Mälberg K; Lagergren P
    BMJ Open; 2022 Sep; 12(9):e058763. PubMed ID: 36581984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of Transthoracic Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wei ZD; Zhang HL; Yang YS; Chen LQ
    J Invest Surg; 2021 Sep; 34(9):963-973. PubMed ID: 32036710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.