These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32591842)

  • 21. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
    Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
    BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
    Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
    Hayami M; Ndegwa N; Lindblad M; Linder G; Hedberg J; Edholm D; Johansson J; Lagergren J; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5609-5621. PubMed ID: 35752726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
    Weksler B; Sullivan JL
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?
    Li J; Shen Y; Tan L; Feng M; Wang H; Xi Y; Wang Q
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 25249141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Hybrid laparoscopic thoracotomic esophagectomy with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis].
    Hoeppner J; Marjanovic G; Glatz T; Kulemann B; Hopt UT
    Chirurg; 2014 Jul; 85(7):628-35. PubMed ID: 25000930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
    Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimal invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatments.
    Chen D; Wang W; Mo J; Ren Q; Miao H; Chen Y; Wen Z
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):145. PubMed ID: 33563244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
    Mitzman B; Lutfi W; Wang CH; Krantz S; Howington JA; Kim KW
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 28823338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Short-term outcome of totally minimally invasive versus hybrid minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
    Yu WQ; Zhai LX; Shi GD; Tang JY; Gao HJ; Wei YC
    Asian J Surg; 2023 Sep; 46(9):3727-3733. PubMed ID: 37085421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term Survival After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity-score Matched Analysis.
    Kalff MC; Fransen LFC; de Groot EM; Gisbertz SS; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Ruurda JP; Verhoeven RHA; Luyer MDP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
    Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):e749-e757. PubMed ID: 33378310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Up-Front Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy on Quality of Life for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.
    Li Z; Cheng J; Zhang Y; Wen S; Lv H; Xu Y; Zhu Y; Zhang Z; Mu D; Tian Z
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):693-701. PubMed ID: 33503901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cost-Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Liu CY; Lin CS; Shih CS; Huang YA; Liu CC; Cheng CT
    World J Surg; 2018 Aug; 42(8):2522-2529. PubMed ID: 29380008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity-score matched analysis.
    Na KJ; Kang CH; Park S; Park IK; Kim YT
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):841-848. PubMed ID: 34542834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-weighted analysis.
    Yun JK; Chong BK; Kim HJ; Lee IS; Gong CS; Kim BS; Lee GD; Choi S; Kim HR; Kim DK; Park SI; Kim YH
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 May; 33(5):. PubMed ID: 31665266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.
    Seesing MFJ; Gisbertz SS; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R; Kroon HM; Lagarde SM; Ruurda JP; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL
    Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 28796016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changes in oncological outcomes: comparison of the conventional and minimally invasive esophagectomy, a single institution experience.
    Khan M; Muzaffar A; Syed AA; Khatak S; Khan AR; Ashraf MI
    Updates Surg; 2016 Dec; 68(4):343-349. PubMed ID: 27629484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.