509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32591884)
1. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis With Nonmalignant Pathology at Biopsy.
Villa-Camacho JC; Bahl M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 35107312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathologic Upgrade Rates of High-Risk Breast Lesions on Digital Two-Dimensional vs Tomosynthesis Mammography.
Lamb LR; Bahl M; Hughes KS; Lehman CD
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 May; 226(5):858-867. PubMed ID: 29410346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital Mammography Has Persistently Increased High-Grade and Overall DCIS Detection Without Altering Upgrade Rate.
Neal CH; Joe AI; Patterson SK; Pujara AC; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):912-918. PubMed ID: 33594910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates.
Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
Hovda T; Brandal SHB; Sebuødegård S; Holen ÅS; Bjørndal H; Skaane P; Hofvind S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6991-6999. PubMed ID: 31187221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.
Conant EF; Barlow WE; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Beaber EF; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Lowry KP; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Li CI; Schnall MD; Onega T; Sprague BL;
JAMA Oncol; 2019 May; 5(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30816931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C;
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of dedicated breast PET in breast cancer screening: comparison with digital mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound.
Yuge S; Miyake KK; Ishimori T; Kataoka M; Matsumoto Y; Torii M; Yakami M; Isoda H; Takakura K; Morita S; Takada M; Toi M; Nakamoto Y
Ann Nucl Med; 2023 Sep; 37(9):479-493. PubMed ID: 37280410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing recall rates following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis to synthetic 2D images and digital mammography on women with breast-conserving surgery.
Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Kim MJ; Park VY; Moon HJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6072-6079. PubMed ID: 32529566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors Affecting Breast Cancer Detectability on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Two-Dimensional Digital Mammography in Patients with Dense Breasts.
Lee SH; Jang MJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Rim J; Chang JM; Kim B; Choi HY
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 20(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 30627022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing accuracy of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography or synthetic 2D mammography in breast cancer screening: baseline results of the MAITA RCT consortium.
Giorgi Rossi P; Mancuso P; Pattacini P; Campari C; Nitrosi A; Iotti V; Ponti A; Frigerio A; Correale L; Riggi E; Giordano L; Segnan N; Di Leo G; Magni V; Sardanelli F; Fornasa F; Romanucci G; Montemezzi S; Falini P; Auzzi N; Zappa M; Ottone M; Mantellini P; Duffy SW; Armaroli P; ; ; Coriani C; Pescarolo M; Stefanelli G; Tondelli G; Beretti F; Caffarri S; Marchesi V; Canovi L; Colli M; Boschini M; Bertolini M; Ragazzi M; Pattacini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Campari C; Caroli S; Nitrosi A; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Mancuso P; Djuric O; Venturelli F; Vicentini M; Braghiroli MB; Lonetti J; Davoli E; Bonelli E; Fornasa F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Lucchi I; Martello G; Rossati C; Mantellini P; Ambrogetti D; Iossa A; Carnesciali E; Mazzalupo V; Falini P; Puliti D; Zappa M; Battisti F; Auzzi N; Verdi S; Degl'Innocenti C; Tramalloni D; Cavazza E; Busoni S; Betti E; Peruzzi F; Regini F; Sardanelli F; Di Leo G; Carbonaro LA; Magni V; Cozzi A; Spinelli D; Monaco CG; Schiaffino S; Benedek A; Menicagli L; Ferraris R; Favettini E; Dettori D; Falco P; Presti P; Segnan N; Ponti A; Frigerio A; Armaroli P; Correale L; Marra V; Milanesio L; Artuso F; Di Leo A; Castellano I; Riggi E; Casella D; Pitarella S; Vergini V; Giordano L; Duffy SW; Graewingholt A; Lang K; Falcini F
Eur J Cancer; 2024 Mar; 199():113553. PubMed ID: 38262307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Community-Based Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Comparison of Screening Performance and Tumor Characteristics.
Regen-Tuero HC; Ram S; Gass JS; Lourenco AP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Feb; 218(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 34523954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) instead of mammography on population screening outcomes including interval cancer rates: Results of the Trento DBT pilot evaluation.
Bernardi D; Gentilini MA; De Nisi M; Pellegrini M; Fantò C; Valentini M; Sabatino V; Luparia A; Houssami N
Breast; 2020 Apr; 50():135-140. PubMed ID: 31607526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of the Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Standard 2D Digital Screening Mammography on the Rates of Patient Recall, Cancer Detection, and Recommendations for Short-term Follow-up.
Powell JL; Hawley JR; Lipari AM; Yildiz VO; Erdal BS; Carkaci S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 27919540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast Cancer Characteristics Associated with 2D Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Screening-detected and Interval Cancers.
Bahl M; Gaffney S; McCarthy AM; Lowry KP; Dang PA; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 29272213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
