497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32591884)
21. Comparison of breast cancers detected in the Verona screening program following transition to digital breast tomosynthesis screening with cancers detected at digital mammography screening.
Caumo F; Romanucci G; Hunter K; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Macaskill P; Houssami N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jul; 170(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 29557996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lee CI; Albertsen J; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Gullien R; Lømo J; Park D; Romundstad L; Suhrke P; Vigeland E; Skaane P
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 29494322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Noncalcified Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): Rate and Predictors of Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma.
Lamb LR; Kim G; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Acad Radiol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):e71-e76. PubMed ID: 32222328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Johnson K; Zackrisson S; Rosso A; Sartor H; Saal LH; Andersson I; Lång K
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 31478799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions.
Cohen EO; Korhonen KE; Sun J; Leung JWT
Eur Radiol; 2023 Sep; 33(9):6189-6203. PubMed ID: 37042980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) at Breast MRI: Predictors of Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma.
Lamb LR; Lehman CD; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Acad Radiol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):1394-1399. PubMed ID: 31699638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interval and Subsequent Round Breast Cancer in a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screening.
Hofvind S; Moshina N; Holen ÅS; Danielsen AS; Lee CI; Houssami N; Aase HS; Akslen LA; Haldorsen IS
Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 33973840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing Tumor Characteristics and Rates of Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
Dang PA; Wang A; Senapati GM; Ip IK; Lacson R; Khorasani R; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):701-706. PubMed ID: 31613659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.
Lowry KP; Coley RY; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Herschorn S; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher G; Lee CI
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2011792. PubMed ID: 32721031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Diagnostic Mammography-Guided Biopsy and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Calcifications: Results in 1354 Biopsies.
Nguyen DL; Boron A; Oluyemi ET; Myers KS; Mullen LA; Ambinder EB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):212-223. PubMed ID: 36102725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.
Skaane P; Østerås BH; Yanakiev S; Lie T; Eben EB; Gullien R; Brandal SHB
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3912-3923. PubMed ID: 37938385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography for Detection of Early-Stage Cancers Stratified by Grade: A TOSYMA Subanalysis.
Weigel S; Heindel W; Decker T; Weyer-Elberich V; Kerschke L; Gerß J; Hense HW;
Radiology; 2023 Dec; 309(3):e231533. PubMed ID: 38051184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. False-Negative Rates of Breast Cancer Screening with and without Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Durand MA; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Copit DS; Barke LD; Rose SL; Hayes MK; Greer LN; Dabbous FM; Conant EF
Radiology; 2021 Feb; 298(2):296-305. PubMed ID: 33258744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A randomized controlled trial of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in population-based screening in Bergen: interim analysis of performance indicators from the To-Be trial.
Aase HS; Holen ÅS; Pedersen K; Houssami N; Haldorsen IS; Sebuødegård S; Hanestad B; Hofvind S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1175-1186. PubMed ID: 30159620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Digital 2D versus Tomosynthesis Screening Mammography among Women Aged 65 and Older in the United States.
Bahl M; Pinnamaneni N; Mercaldo S; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):582-590. PubMed ID: 30938625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
