164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32591939)
1. Ureteral injuries in colorectal surgery and the impact of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches.
Mayo JS; Brazer ML; Bogenberger KJ; Tavares KB; Conrad RJ; Lustik MB; Gillern SM; Park CW; Richards CR
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):2805-2816. PubMed ID: 32591939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regional variations and deprivation are linked to poorer access to laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery: a national study in England.
Morton AJ; Simpson A; Humes DJ
Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Dec; 28(1):9. PubMed ID: 38078978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Iatrogenic ureteral injury in colorectal cancer surgery: a nationwide study comparing laparoscopic and open approaches.
Andersen P; Andersen LM; Iversen LH
Surg Endosc; 2015 Jun; 29(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 25154890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches to Colorectal Operations.
Hajirawala LN; Leonardi C; Orangio GR; Davis KG; Barton JS
Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):2129-2131. PubMed ID: 34318696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the Regional Uptake of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: a Report from the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program.
Unruh KR; Bastawrous AL; Bernier GV; Flum DR; Kumar AS; Moonka R; Thirlby RC; Simianu VV
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2387-2397. PubMed ID: 33206328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.
Disbrow DE; Pannell SM; Shanker BA; Albright J; Wu J; Bastawrous A; Soliman M; Ferraro J; Cleary RK
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):767-778. PubMed ID: 29054345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery.
Tam MS; Kaoutzanis C; Mullard AJ; Regenbogen SE; Franz MG; Hendren S; Krapohl G; Vandewarker JF; Lampman RM; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):455-463. PubMed ID: 25894448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery.
Hollis RH; Cannon JA; Singletary BA; Korb ML; Hawn MT; Heslin MJ
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):850-856. PubMed ID: 27398733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frailer Patients Undergoing Robotic Colectomies for Colon Cancer Experience Increased Complication Rates Compared With Open or Laparoscopic Approaches.
Lo BD; Leeds IL; Sundel MH; Gearhart S; Nisly GRC; Safar B; Atallah C; Fang SH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 May; 63(5):588-597. PubMed ID: 32032198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cost benefit analysis of increasing surgical technology in lumbar spine fusion.
Passias PG; Brown AE; Alas H; Bortz CA; Pierce KE; Hassanzadeh H; Labaran LA; Puvanesarajah V; Vasquez-Montes D; Wang E; Ihejirika RC; Diebo BG; Lafage V; Lafage R; Sciubba DM; Janjua MB; Protopsaltis TS; Buckland AJ; Gerling MC
Spine J; 2021 Feb; 21(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 33069859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adoption of Robotic Technology for Treating Colorectal Cancer.
Schootman M; Hendren S; Ratnapradipa K; Stringer L; Davidson NO
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 27749475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Genitourinary Trauma: A Nationwide Outcomes-Based Analysis.
Collins WJ; El-Qawaqzeh K; Ditillo M; Hosseinpour H; Nelson A; Bhogadi SK; Castanon L; Gries L; Anand T; Joseph B
J Surg Res; 2023 Feb; 282():129-136. PubMed ID: 36272231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open versus minimally invasive surgical approaches in pediatric urology: Trends in utilization and complications.
Tejwani R; Young BJ; Wang HS; Wolf S; Purves JT; Wiener JS; Routh JC
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Jun; 13(3):283.e1-283.e9. PubMed ID: 28344019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.
Altieri MS; Yang J; Telem DA; Zhu J; Halbert C; Talamini M; Pryor AD
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):925-33. PubMed ID: 26139489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Cleary RK; Mullard AJ; Ferraro J; Regenbogen SE
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 28916895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of Pediatric Open, Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation in the United States: 2000 to 2012.
Bowen DK; Faasse MA; Liu DB; Gong EM; Lindgren BW; Johnson EK
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):207-12. PubMed ID: 26880414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer.
Zhu XL; Yan PJ; Yao L; Liu R; Wu DW; Du BB; Yang KH; Guo TK; Yang XF
Surg Innov; 2019 Feb; 26(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 30191755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Security and Radical Assessment in Open, Laparoscopic, Robotic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study.
Yang SX; Sun ZQ; Zhou QB; Xu JZ; Chang Y; Xia KK; Wang GX; Li Z; Song JM; Zhang ZY; Yuan WT; Liu JB
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818794160. PubMed ID: 30198395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of outcome and cost between the open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide hospital record database.
Chiu CC; Hsu WT; Choi JJ; Galm B; Lee MG; Chang CN; Liu CC; Lee CC
Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3757-3765. PubMed ID: 30675661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
