137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32592971)
1. Centroparietal activity mirrors the decision variable when tracking biased and time-varying sensory evidence.
Kohl C; Spieser L; Forster B; Bestmann S; Yarrow K
Cogn Psychol; 2020 Nov; 122():101321. PubMed ID: 32592971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relation between centro-parietal positivity and diffusion model parameters in both perceptual and memory-based decision making.
van Vugt MK; Beulen MA; Taatgen NA
Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1715():1-12. PubMed ID: 30876858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neurodynamic Evidence Supports a Forced-Excursion Model of Decision-Making under Speed/Accuracy Instructions.
Spieser L; Kohl C; Forster B; Bestmann S; Yarrow K
eNeuro; 2018; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 29951578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Internal and external influences on the rate of sensory evidence accumulation in the human brain.
Kelly SP; O'Connell RG
J Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 33(50):19434-41. PubMed ID: 24336710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abstract and Effector-Selective Decision Signals Exhibit Qualitatively Distinct Dynamics before Delayed Perceptual Reports.
Twomey DM; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG
J Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 36(28):7346-52. PubMed ID: 27413146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accumulation of continuously time-varying sensory evidence constrains neural and behavioral responses in human collision threat detection.
Markkula G; Uludağ Z; Wilkie RM; Billington J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009096. PubMed ID: 34264935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence and Urgency Related EEG Signals during Dynamic Decision-Making in Humans.
Yau Y; Hinault T; Taylor M; Cisek P; Fellows LK; Dagher A
J Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 41(26):5711-5722. PubMed ID: 34035140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments.
Ruesseler M; Weber LA; Marshall TR; O'Reilly J; Hunt LT
Elife; 2023 Oct; 12():. PubMed ID: 37883173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of premature evidence accumulation in making difficult perceptual decisions under temporal uncertainty.
Devine CA; Gaffney C; Loughnane GM; Kelly SP; O'Connell RG
Elife; 2019 Nov; 8():. PubMed ID: 31774396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The neural processes underlying perceptual decision making in humans: recent progress and future directions.
Kelly SP; O'Connell RG
J Physiol Paris; 2015; 109(1-3):27-37. PubMed ID: 25204272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Properties and temporal dynamics of choice- and action-predictive signals during item recognition decisions.
Guidotti R; Tosoni A; Sestieri C
Brain Struct Funct; 2020 Sep; 225(7):2271-2286. PubMed ID: 32772167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The EEG signature of sensory evidence accumulation during decision formation closely tracks subjective perceptual experience.
Tagliabue CF; Veniero D; Benwell CSY; Cecere R; Savazzi S; Thut G
Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4949. PubMed ID: 30894558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biological motion perception in the theoretical framework of perceptual decision-making: An event-related potential study.
Oguz OC; Aydin B; Urgen BA
Vision Res; 2024 May; 218():108380. PubMed ID: 38479050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decreasing Alertness Modulates Perceptual Decision-Making.
Jagannathan SR; Bareham CA; Bekinschtein TA
J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(3):454-473. PubMed ID: 34815316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices.
Braun A; Urai AE; Donner TH
J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2418-2429. PubMed ID: 29371318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A low-frequency oscillatory neural signal in humans encodes a developing decision variable.
Kubanek J; Snyder LH; Brunton BW; Brody CD; Schalk G
Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():795-808. PubMed ID: 23872495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attention facilitates initiation of perceptual decision making: a combined psychophysical and electroencephalography study.
Ueno T; Kumano H; Uka T
Exp Brain Res; 2024 Jul; 242(7):1721-1730. PubMed ID: 38816552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution.
Boehm U; van Maanen L; Forstmann B; van Rijn H
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():95-105. PubMed ID: 24699015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using Covert Response Activation to Test Latent Assumptions of Formal Decision-Making Models in Humans.
Servant M; White C; Montagnini A; Burle B
J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(28):10371-85. PubMed ID: 26180211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Neural Decision Signal during Internal Sampling from Working Memory in Humans.
van Ede F; Nobre AC
J Neurosci; 2024 May; 44(19):. PubMed ID: 38538144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
