These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32593505)

  • 21. Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: Incorporation of left ventricular systolic function and stroke volume index.
    Parikh R; Goodman AL; Barr T; Sabik JF; Svensson LG; Rodriguez LL; Lytle BW; Grimm RA; Griffin BP; Desai MY
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 149(6):1558-66.e1. PubMed ID: 25869085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Commissural Alignment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve and Native Aortic Valve Following Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and its Impact on Valvular Function and Coronary Filling.
    Fuchs A; Kofoed KF; Yoon SH; Schaffner Y; Bieliauskas G; Thyregod HG; Makkar R; Søndergaard L; De Backer O; Bapat V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(17):1733-1743. PubMed ID: 30121280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High- Versus Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: Demographics, Clinical Outcomes, and Effects of the Initial Aortic Valve Replacement Strategy on Long-Term Prognosis.
    Taniguchi T; Morimoto T; Shiomi H; Ando K; Kanamori N; Murata K; Kitai T; Kawase Y; Izumi C; Miyake M; Mitsuoka H; Kato M; Hirano Y; Matsuda S; Inada T; Nagao K; Murakami T; Takeuchi Y; Yamane K; Toyofuku M; Ishii M; Minamino-Muta E; Kato T; Inoko M; Ikeda T; Komasa A; Ishii K; Hotta K; Higashitani N; Kato Y; Inuzuka Y; Maeda C; Jinnai T; Morikami Y; Saito N; Minatoya K; Kimura T;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28500139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sutureless aortic valve replacement with the Trilogy Aortic Valve System: multicenter experience.
    Breitenbach I; Wimmer-Greinecker G; Bockeria LA; Sadowski J; Schmitz C; Kapelak B; Bartus K; Muratov R; Harringer W
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Oct; 140(4):878-84, 884.e1. PubMed ID: 20674945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Surgical sutureless and transcatheter aortic valves: hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes in propensity score-matched high-risk populations with severe aortic stenosis.
    Kamperidis V; van Rosendael PJ; de Weger A; Katsanos S; Regeer M; van der Kley F; Mertens B; Sianos G; Ajmone Marsan N; Bax JJ; Delgado V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(5):670-7. PubMed ID: 25946438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Outcome of Patients with Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Kugelman N; Jaffe R; Aronson D; Sharoni E; Adawi S; Khader N; Shiran A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Mar; 21(3):257-262. PubMed ID: 31103371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Søndergaard L; Steinbrüchel DA; Ihlemann N; Nissen H; Kjeldsen BJ; Petursson P; Ngo AT; Olsen NT; Chang Y; Franzen OW; Engstrøm T; Clemmensen P; Olsen PS; Thyregod HG
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27296202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hemodynamic function of the standard St. Jude bileaflet disc valve has no clinical impact 10 years after aortic valve replacement.
    Lund O; Dørup I; Emmertsen K; Jensen FT; Flø C
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2005 Sep; 39(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 16118072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hemodynamic changes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation during sequential follow-ups in patients with bicuspid aortic valve compared with tricuspid aortic valve.
    Xiong TY; Zheng MX; Wei X; Li YJ; Liao YB; Zhao ZG; Xu YN; Tang H; Feng Y; Chen M
    Cardiol J; 2017; 24(4):350-357. PubMed ID: 28248407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Aortic pulse wave velocity and its relationship with transaortic flow and gradients in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement.
    Ranjan S; Grewal HK; Kasliwal RR; Trehan N; Bansal M
    Indian Heart J; 2020; 72(5):421-426. PubMed ID: 33189205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation with the direct flow medical prosthesis: Single center short-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.
    Kische S; D'Ancona G; Agma HU; El-Achkar G; Dißmann M; Ortak J; Ince H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 89(3):420-428. PubMed ID: 27739170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Aortic valve replacement reduces valvuloarterial impedance but does not affect systemic arterial compliance in elderly men with degenerative calcific trileaflet aortic valve stenosis.
    Pagel PS; Schroeder AR; De Vry DJ; Hudetz JA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1540-4. PubMed ID: 25267695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Aortic valve prosthesis-patient mismatch and long-term outcomes: 19-year single-center experience.
    Tully PJ; Aty W; Rice GD; Bennetts JS; Knight JL; Baker RA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 96(3):844-50. PubMed ID: 23810177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis patients.
    Debry N; Sudre A; Amr G; Delhaye C; Schurtz G; Montaigne D; Koussa M; Modine T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 26424679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predictors of outcomes in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results of the multicenter TOPAS Study.
    Clavel MA; Fuchs C; Burwash IG; Mundigler G; Dumesnil JG; Baumgartner H; Bergler-Klein J; Beanlands RS; Mathieu P; Magne J; Pibarot P
    Circulation; 2008 Sep; 118(14 Suppl):S234-42. PubMed ID: 18824760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Postoperative Reverse Remodeling and Symptomatic Improvement in Normal-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis After Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Carter-Storch R; Møller JE; Christensen NL; Irmukhadenov A; Rasmussen LM; Pecini R; Øvrehus KA; Søndergård EV; Marcussen N; Dahl JS
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29222121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of size mismatch and left ventricular function on performance of the St. Jude disc valve after aortic valve replacement.
    Lund O; Emmertsen K; Nielsen TT; Jensen FT; Flø C; Pilegaard HK; Rasmussen BS; Hansen OK; Kristensen LH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1997 May; 63(5):1227-34. PubMed ID: 9146307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Incremental Prognostic Use of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Asymptomatic/Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Severe Bioprosthetic Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Redo Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Naji P; Shah S; Svensson LG; Gillinov AM; Johnston DR; Rodriguez LL; Grimm RA; Griffin BP; Desai MY
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28559420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Outcome and Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Preserved LVEF and Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.
    Dayan V; Vignolo G; Magne J; Clavel MA; Mohty D; Pibarot P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 66(23):2594-2603. PubMed ID: 26670058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical performance of a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis: five-year results of the 3f Enable long-term follow-up study.
    Englberger L; Carrel TP; Doss M; Sadowski J; Bartus K; Eckstein FF; Asch FM; Martens S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Oct; 148(4):1681-7. PubMed ID: 24787699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.