These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32593585)

  • 1. The Challenges of Implementing the Clinical Data Standards.
    Tempe DK; Neema PK
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2020 Nov; 34(11):2881-2883. PubMed ID: 32593585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concerns about composite reference standards in diagnostic research.
    Dendukuri N; Schiller I; de Groot J; Libman M; Moons K; Reitsma J; van Smeden M
    BMJ; 2018 Jan; 360():j5779. PubMed ID: 29348126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
    Walsh T
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Liver-FibroSTARD checklist and glossary: tools for standardized design and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of liver fibrosis tests.
    Guéchot J; Boursier J; de Ledinghen V; Poynard T; Carrat F; Leroy V; Wong GL; Friedrich-Rust M; Fraquelli M; Plebani M; Sebastiani G; Myers R; Angulo P; Bertrais S; Wendum D; Bricault I; Calès P;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Jul; 53(8):1135-7. PubMed ID: 25997161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metrology is key to reproducing results.
    Sené M; Gilmore I; Janssen JT
    Nature; 2017 Jul; 547(7664):397-399. PubMed ID: 28748943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Notions of quality and standards for qualitative research reporting.
    Pearson A; Jordan Z; Lockwood C; Aromataris E
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2015 Oct; 21(5):670-6. PubMed ID: 25521613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NIST lipidomics workflow questionnaire: an assessment of community-wide methodologies and perspectives.
    Bowden JA; Ulmer CZ; Jones CM; Koelmel JP; Yost RA
    Metabolomics; 2018 Mar; 14(5):53. PubMed ID: 30830346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An extension of STARD statements for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies on liver fibrosis tests: the Liver-FibroSTARD standards.
    Boursier J; de Ledinghen V; Poynard T; Guéchot J; Carrat F; Leroy V; Wong GL; Friedrich-Rust M; Fraquelli M; Plebani M; Sebastiani G; Myers R; Angulo P; Bertrais S; Wendum D; Bricault I; Calès P; ;
    J Hepatol; 2015 Apr; 62(4):807-15. PubMed ID: 25450206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Describing numerical variables: which are the most appropriate parameters to describe the data?
    Duquia RP; González-Chica DA; Bastos JL; Martínez-Mesa J; Bonamigo RR
    An Bras Dermatol; 2017; 92(6):841-843. PubMed ID: 29364444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recent China Food and Drug Administration reform: impact on the present and future of bioanalytical contract research organization laboratories in China.
    Meng M
    Bioanalysis; 2017 Sep; 9(17):1285-1288. PubMed ID: 28901171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is it Possible to Make Everyone Talk in the Same Language?
    Lau M; Fung V; Cheung NT; Wong A; Tam E; Wai A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():1086. PubMed ID: 26262385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metrological Traceability of Assays and Comparability of Patient Test Results.
    Armbruster D
    Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):119-135. PubMed ID: 28153360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gold standards are out and Bayes is in: Implementing the cure for imperfect reference tests in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Johnson WO; Jones G; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2019 Jun; 167():113-127. PubMed ID: 31027713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lipidomics, en route to accurate quantitation.
    Lam SM; Tian H; Shui G
    Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids; 2017 Aug; 1862(8):752-761. PubMed ID: 28216054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-reporting data assets and their representation in the pharmaceutical industry.
    Della Corte D; Colsman W; Fessenmayr H; Sawczuk da Silva A; Vanderwall DE
    Drug Discov Today; 2022 Jan; 27(1):207-214. PubMed ID: 34332096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing a new reference standard: is validation necessary?
    Gold R; Reichman M; Greenberg E; Ivanidze J; Elias E; Tsiouris AJ; Comunale JP; Johnson CE; Sanelli PC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1079-82. PubMed ID: 20692619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NormalizeMets: assessing, selecting and implementing statistical methods for normalizing metabolomics data.
    De Livera AM; Olshansky G; Simpson JA; Creek DJ
    Metabolomics; 2018 Mar; 14(5):54. PubMed ID: 30830328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A potential for seamless designs in diagnostic research could be identified.
    Vach W; Bibiza E; Gerke O; Bossuyt PM; Friede T; Zapf A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 129():51-59. PubMed ID: 32991994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study designs for comparative diagnostic test accuracy: A methodological review and classification scheme.
    Yang B; Olsen M; Vali Y; Langendam MW; Takwoingi Y; Hyde CJ; Bossuyt PMM; Leeflang MMG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():128-138. PubMed ID: 33915262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability of cytokine gene expression in intestinal tissue and the impact of normalization with the use of reference genes.
    McGowan I; Janocko L; Burneisen S; Bhat A; Richardson-Harman N
    Cytokine; 2015 Jan; 71(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25265568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.