These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32593627)
21. [Clinical effect of circumcision stapler in the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce]. Huo ZC; Liu G; Wang W; He DG; Yu H; Fan WJ; Zhong Z Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Apr; 21(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 26027100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A prospective, randomized controlled trial of circumcision in adult males using the CO2 laser: modified technique compared with the conventional dorsal-slit technique. Xu Y; Li F; Li Z; Guan W; Wu Y; Ouyang Y; Zhao Y; Liu C Photomed Laser Surg; 2013 Sep; 31(9):422-7. PubMed ID: 23869518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Abnormally short frenulum induced by circumcision with the disposable circumcision suture device: Causes and improvement of the surgical method]. Shen MQ; Shi TL; Yang RH Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2020 Dec; 26(12):1096-1110. PubMed ID: 34898084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a ring device versus conventional circumcision. Yue C; Ze-Jun Y; Wu KR; Su XJ; Hu JS; Ma JW; Guo CM; Fang HW; Su R; Zhang Y; Zhang QH J Urol; 2012 Nov; 188(5):1849-54. PubMed ID: 22999700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Jin XD; Lu JJ; Liu WH; Zhou J; Yu RK; Yu B; Zhang XJ; Shen BH Braz J Med Biol Res; 2015 Jun; 48(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 25831203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative efficacy and safety of different circumcisions for patients with redundant prepuce or phimosis: A network meta-analysis. Huang C; Song P; Xu C; Wang R; Wei L; Zhao X Int J Surg; 2017 Jul; 43():17-25. PubMed ID: 28522221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative analysis of two methods in circumcision: a new disposable device versus classic sleeve technique. Kılıç S BMC Urol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38877524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Frenulum Protection Technique in Disposable Circumcision Suture Device for Adult Males. Lu X; Piao S; Qin S; Zhang K; Li J; Zhou W; Tang L; Yan S; Chen Y; Yin G; Zhou T Urol J; 2023 Dec; 20(6):424-428. PubMed ID: 37990798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Modified Pressure Dressing to Avoid Severe Bleeding After Circumcision With a Disposable Circumcision Suture Device and a Discussion on the Mechanism of Bleeding With the Disposable Circumcision Suture Device. Jiang W; Fu JL; Guo WL; Yan ZC; Zheng RQ; Lu JR; Lai XD Sex Med; 2021 Apr; 9(2):100288. PubMed ID: 33765458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Rapid, minimally invasive adult voluntary male circumcision: a randomised trial of Unicirc, a novel disposable device. Millard PS; Wilson HR; Goldstuck ND; Anaso C S Afr Med J; 2013 Nov; 104(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 24388090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Simple circumcision device: proof of concept for a single-visit, adjustable device to facilitate safe adult male circumcision. Hotaling JM; Leddy LS; Haider MA; Mossanen M; Bailey MR; MacConaghy B; Olson F; Krieger JN Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1266-70. PubMed ID: 24613534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimally invasive circumcision with a novel plastic clamp technique: a review of 7,500 cases. Senel FM; Demirelli M; Oztek S Pediatr Surg Int; 2010 Jul; 26(7):739-45. PubMed ID: 20532526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [A new device for removing Shang ring after circumcision ( a report of 257 cases)]. Zhang JQ; Liu JH; Jin LC; Tian L; Zhang JH; Wang Y; Zhang XD Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 96(14):1128-30. PubMed ID: 27095783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Comparison of the disposable circumcision stapler, disposable prepuce ligator and traditional surgical method in circumcision]. Peng L; Han YF; Chen D; Lai B; Huang HC Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2020 Dec; 26(12):1101-1104. PubMed ID: 34898085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical application of a new device for minimally invasive circumcision. Peng YF; Cheng Y; Wang GY; Wang SQ; Jia C; Yang BH; Zhu R; Jian SC; Li QW; Geng DW Asian J Androl; 2008 May; 10(3):447-54. PubMed ID: 18385906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Circumcision with a new disposable clamp: is it really easier and more reliable? Aldemir M; Cakan M; Burgu B Int Urol Nephrol; 2008; 40(2):377-81. PubMed ID: 17899432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Comparative Study on the Clinical Efficacy of Modified Circumcision and Two Other Types of Circumcision. Su Q; Gao S; Chen J; Lu C; Mao W; Wu X; Zhang L; Zuo L Urol J; 2020 Oct; 18(5):556-560. PubMed ID: 33037606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Religious circumcision under local anaesthesia with a new disposable clamp. Schmitz RF; Schulpen TW; Redjopawiro MS; Liem MS; Madern GC; Van Der Werken C BJU Int; 2001 Oct; 88(6):581-5. PubMed ID: 11678755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Introducing the Quill™ device for modified sleeve circumcision with subcutaneous suture: a retrospective study of 70 cases. Gu C; Tian F; Jia Z; Li G; Meng Z; Xing W; Ding Y; Jin Z; Kan Q; Yang J Urol Int; 2015; 94(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 25677813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Shang Ring scissor circumcision versus electrotome circumcision for redundant prepuce]. Tang XH; Zhang P; Ding H; Zhao JH; Tang LL; Fang Q Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Oct; 22(10):877-881. PubMed ID: 29278467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]