273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32593640)
1. Comparative analysis of direct and indirect costs of two minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of renal/ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm.
Perez-Ardavin J; Lorenzo L; Caballer-Tarazona V; Budía-Alba A; Vivas-Consuelo D; Bahilo-Mateu P; Ordaz-Jurado G; Trassierra-Villa M; López-Acón JD; Boronat-Tormo F
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Sep; 44(7):505-511. PubMed ID: 32593640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness.
Bierkens AF; Hendrikx AJ; De La Rosette JJ; Stultiens GN; Beerlage HP; Arends AJ; Debruyne FM
Br J Urol; 1998 Jan; 81(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 9467473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost analysis of ureteroscopy (URS) vs extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of ureteric stones <10 mm in adults: a UK perspective.
Constanti M; Calvert RC; Thomas K; Dickinson A; Carlisle S
BJU Int; 2020 Mar; 125(3):457-466. PubMed ID: 31663246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Distal ureteral lithiasis. ESWL versus ambulatory URS].
Miján Ortiz JL; Gutiérrez Tejero F; López Carmona F; Nogueras Ocaña M; Arrabal Martín M; Zuluaga Gómez A
Arch Esp Urol; 2001 Nov; 54(9):983-7. PubMed ID: 11789375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis.
Mi Y; Ren K; Pan H; Zhu L; Wu S; You X; Shao H; Dai F; Peng T; Qin F; Wang J; Huang Y
Urolithiasis; 2016 Aug; 44(4):353-65. PubMed ID: 26530230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.
Vilches RM; Aliaga A; Reyes D; Sepulveda F; Mercado A; Moya F; Ledezma R; Hidalgo JP; Olmedo T; Marchant F
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 May; 39(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 25435403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.
Strohmaier WL; Schubert G; Rosenkranz T; Weigl A
Eur Urol; 1999 Nov; 36(5):376-9. PubMed ID: 10516445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of ureteric lithiasis with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy vs extracorporeal lithotripsy.
Arrabal-Polo MA; Arrabal-Martín M; Miján-Ortiz JL; Valle-Díaz F; López-León V; Merino-Salas S; Zuluaga-Gómez A
BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(8):1144-7. PubMed ID: 19338552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteric calculi: a cost-effectiveness study.
Izamin I; Aniza I; Rizal AM; Aljunid SM
Med J Malaysia; 2009 Mar; 64(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19852314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of ESWL and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in management of ureteral stones.
Cui Y; Cao W; Shen H; Xie J; Adams TS; Zhang Y; Shao Q
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87634. PubMed ID: 24498344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?
Tiselius HG
Urol Res; 2005 Jun; 33(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 15924257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
Arcaniolo D; De Sio M; Rassweiler J; Nicholas J; Lima E; Carrieri G; Liatsikos E; Mirone V; Monga M; Autorino R
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):563-572. PubMed ID: 28233025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of Flexible Holmium Laser Sheath in Rigid Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Impacted Upper Ureteral Stones.
Xiong Y; Liu J; Zhao T
Arch Esp Urol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 36914419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of retrograde intrarenal surgery for asymptomatic renal stones in patients undergoing ureteroscopy for a symptomatic ureteral stone.
Goldberg H; Holland R; Tal R; Lask DM; Livne PM; Lifshitz DA
J Endourol; 2013 Aug; 27(8):970-3. PubMed ID: 23537311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.
Lindqvist K; Holmberg G; Peeker R; Grenabo L
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 16608808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of focal applied energy quotient in treatment of ureteral lithiasis with shock waves.
Arrabal-Polo MA; Arrabal-Martin M; Palao-Yago F; Mijan-Ortiz JL; Zuluaga-Gomez A
Urol Res; 2012 Aug; 40(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 22002726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteric calculi: efficacy and patient satisfaction.
Ghalayini IF; Al-Ghazo MA; Khader YS
Int Braz J Urol; 2006; 32(6):656-64; discussion 664-7. PubMed ID: 17201943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrograde intrarenal surgery with holmium-YAG laser lithotripsy in the primary treatment of renal lithiasis.
Redondo C; Ramón de Fata F; Gimbernat H; Meilán E; Andrés G; Angulo JC
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 Jun; 39(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 25443519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
