227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32594270)
1. Sacrococcygeal dimensions and curvature are associated with resection quality in rectal cancer excision.
Simpson G; Marks T; Blacker S; Smith D; Walsh C
Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 32594270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Predictive value of MRI pelvic measurements for "difficult pelvis" during total mesorectal excision].
Sun Z; Hou WY; Liu JJ; Xue HD; Xu PR; Wu B; Lin GL; Xu L; Lu JY; Xiao Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 25(12):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 36562232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopy-assisted triple-port anterior resection].
Wu H; Zhang T; Chen X; Jing X; Cheng X; Song Z; Zhu L; He Y; Ji X; Zhang H; Zhao R
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):779-785. PubMed ID: 30051446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Computed tomography pelvimetry as a predictor of technical difficulty in total mesorectal excision].
Yan HH; Lou Z; Sheng J; Zhang W; Fu CG; Meng RG
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 14(11):846-50. PubMed ID: 22116717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Tumour Distance From the Anal Verge on Clinical Management and Outcomes in Patients Having a Curative Resection for Rectal Cancer.
Khan MAS; Ang CW; Hakeem AR; Scott N; Saunders RN; Botterill I
J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Dec; 21(12):2056-2065. PubMed ID: 28924962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mesorectal fat area as a useful predictor of the difficulty of robotic-assisted laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Yamaoka Y; Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Furutani A; Manabe S; Torii K; Koido K; Mori K
Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):557-566. PubMed ID: 30006838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT pelvimetry and clinicopathological parameters in evaluation of the technical difficulties in performing open rectal surgery for mid-low rectal cancer.
Zhou XC; Su M; Hu KQ; Su YF; Ye YH; Huang CQ; Yu ZL; Li XY; Zhou H; Ni YZ; Jiang YI; Lou Z
Oncol Lett; 2016 Jan; 11(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 26870163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Construction of a nomogram model to predict technical difficulty in performing laparoscopic sphincter-preserving radical resection for rectal cancer.
Zhou XC; Guan SW; Ke FY; Dhamija G; Wang Q; Chen BF
World J Gastroenterol; 2024 May; 30(18):2418-2439. PubMed ID: 38764764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.
Selvindos PB; Ho YH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-1. PubMed ID: 18679748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of MRI pelvimetry in predicting technical difficulty and outcomes of open and minimally invasive total mesorectal excision: a systematic review.
Hong JS; Brown KGM; Waller J; Young CJ; Solomon MJ
Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Oct; 24(10):991-1000. PubMed ID: 32623536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer.
Akiyoshi T; Kuroyanagi H; Oya M; Konishi T; Fukuda M; Fujimoto Y; Ueno M; Miyata S; Yamaguchi T
Surgery; 2009 Sep; 146(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 19715805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy.
Targarona EM; Balague C; Pernas JC; Martinez C; Berindoague R; Gich I; Trias M
Ann Surg; 2008 Apr; 247(4):642-9. PubMed ID: 18362627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis on prognosis and influencing factors of postoperative low anterior resection syndrome for rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic anus-preserving radical resection].
Zuo LG; Ge ST; Wang X; Zhu YK; Liu ZH; Yang YT; Jiang CQ; Li SQ; Liu ML
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 22(6):573-578. PubMed ID: 31238637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Analysis on clinical factors affecting transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction in rectal cancer surgery].
Huang B; Zhou ZQ; Zhou H; Liu MC; Du T; Lu B; Han JY; Gao W; Zhu Z; Fu CG
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 May; 23(5):480-485. PubMed ID: 32842428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The endorectal incision level of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): An emphasis on the distance from the anterior vs. posterior mesorectal ends to the anal verge.
Ghareeb WM; Wang X; Zhao X; Emile SH; Shawki S; Chi P
J Visc Surg; 2023 Apr; 160(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 36184494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pelvic dimensions on preoperative imaging can identify poor-quality resections after laparoscopic low anterior resection for mid- and low rectal cancer.
Chau J; Solomon J; Liberman AS; Charlebois P; Stein B; Lee L
Surg Endosc; 2020 Oct; 34(10):4609-4615. PubMed ID: 31620910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predicting the pathological features of the mesorectum before the laparoscopic approach to rectal cancer.
Fernández Ananín S; Targarona EM; Martinez C; Pernas JC; Hernández D; Gich I; Sancho FJ; Trias M
Surg Endosc; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3458-66. PubMed ID: 24950725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
