These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32595269)

  • 1. Physical and social cues shape nest-site preference and prey capture behavior in social spiders.
    Najm GM; Pe A; Pruitt JN; Pinter-Wollman N
    Behav Ecol; 2020; 31(3):627-632. PubMed ID: 32595269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Collective behavior and colony persistence of social spiders depends on their physical environment.
    Kamath A; Primavera SD; Wright CM; Doering GN; Sheehy KA; Pinter-Wollman N; Pruitt JN
    Behav Ecol; 2019; 30(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 30846891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Warring arthropod societies: Social spider colonies can delay annihilation by predatory ants via reduced apparency and increased group size.
    Keiser CN; Wright CM; Pruitt JN
    Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():14-21. PubMed ID: 26205161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Host Plant Availability and Nest-Site Selection of the Social Spider
    Rose C; Schramm A; Irish J; Bilde T; Bird TL
    Insects; 2021 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 35055873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild.
    Keiser CN; Pruitt JN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1796):20141424. PubMed ID: 25320170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial proximity and prey vibratory cues influence collective hunting in social spiders.
    Wright CM; Lichtenstein JLL; Luscuskie LP; Montgomery GA; Geary S; Pruitt JN; Pinter-Wollman N; Keiser CN
    Isr J Ecol Evol; 2020 Dec; 66(1-2):26-31. PubMed ID: 34108848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Good reasons to leave home: proximate dispersal cues in a social spider.
    Berger-Tal R; Berner-Aharon N; Aharon S; Tuni C; Lubin Y
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jul; 85(4):1035-42. PubMed ID: 27084588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Kleptoparasitic Ants on the Foraging Behavior of a Social Spider (
    Mohanan Drisya-Mohan O; Kavyamol P; Sudhikumar AV
    Zool Stud; 2019; 58():e3. PubMed ID: 31966304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information from familiar and related conspecifics affects foraging in a solitary wolf spider.
    Hoffman CR; Sitvarin MI; Rypstra AL
    Oecologia; 2016 Jun; 181(2):359-67. PubMed ID: 26497123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Participation in cooperative prey capture and the benefits gained from it are associated with individual personality.
    Lichtenstein JLL; Wright CM; Luscuskie LP; Montgomery GA; Pinter-Wollman N; Pruitt JN
    Curr Zool; 2017 Oct; 63(5):561-567. PubMed ID: 29033979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prey interception drives web invasion and spider size determines successful web takeover in nocturnal orb-web spiders.
    Gan W; Liu S; Yang X; Li D; Lei C
    Biol Open; 2015 Sep; 4(10):1326-9. PubMed ID: 26405048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social spider webs harbour largely consistent bacterial communities across broad spatial scales.
    Keiser CN; Hammer TJ; Pruitt JN
    Biol Lett; 2019 Sep; 15(9):20190436. PubMed ID: 31551063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extended phenotypes can underlie trade-offs: a case of social spiders.
    Parthasarathy B; Bouchard M; Schneider JM
    Naturwissenschaften; 2022 Oct; 109(6):51. PubMed ID: 36308596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nest-site selection of passerines: effects of geographic scale and public and personal information.
    Citta JJ; Lindberg MS
    Ecology; 2007 Aug; 88(8):2034-46. PubMed ID: 17824435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predation-related costs and benefits of conspecific attraction in songbirds--an agent-based approach.
    Szymkowiak J; Kuczyński L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119132. PubMed ID: 25790479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cooperative foraging expands dietary niche but does not offset intra-group competition for resources in social spiders.
    Majer M; Holm C; Lubin Y; Bilde T
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):11828. PubMed ID: 30087391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resting networks and personality predict attack speed in social spiders.
    Hunt ER; Mi B; Geremew R; Fernandez C; Wong BM; Pruitt JN; Pinter-Wollman N
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2019 Jul; 73(7):. PubMed ID: 32440036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The legacy effects of keystone individuals on collective behaviour scale to how long they remain within a group.
    Pruitt JN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Sep; 282(1814):. PubMed ID: 26336171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The bacterial and fungal nest microbiomes in populations of the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola.
    Nazipi S; Elberg CL; Busck MM; Lund MB; Bilde T; Schramm A
    Syst Appl Microbiol; 2021 Jul; 44(4):126222. PubMed ID: 34146923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exposure to predators reduces collective foraging aggressiveness and eliminates its relationship with colony personality composition.
    Wright CM; Lichtenstein JLL; Montgomery GA; Luscuskie LP; Pinter-Wollman N; Pruitt JN
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2017 Aug; 71(8):. PubMed ID: 29606787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.