These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32595896)

  • 1. Outcome comparison between diode laser pulpotomy and formocresol pulpotomy on human primary molars.
    Pei SL; Shih WY; Liu JF
    J Dent Sci; 2020 Jun; 15(2):163-167. PubMed ID: 32595896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and Radiographic Success of Low-Level Laser Therapy Compared with Formocresol Pulpotomy Treatment in Primary Molars.
    Alamoudi N; Nadhreen A; Sabbagh H; El Meligy O; Al Tuwirqi A; Elkhodary H
    Pediatr Dent; 2020 Sep; 42(5):359-366. PubMed ID: 33087220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of diode laser pulpotomy on human primary teeth.
    Ansari G; Chitsazan A; Fekrazad R; Javadi F
    Laser Ther; 2018 Sep; 27(3):187-192. PubMed ID: 32158064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of a novel alternative to conventional formocresol-zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpally involved human primary teeth: diode laser-mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy.
    Saltzman B; Sigal M; Clokie C; Rukavina J; Titley K; Kulkarni GV
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Nov; 15(6):437-47. PubMed ID: 16238654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo evaluation of the treatment outcome of pulpotomy in primary molars using diode laser, formocresol, and ferric sulphate.
    Durmus B; Tanboga I
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2014 May; 32(5):289-95. PubMed ID: 24717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Diode and Er,Cr:YSGG Lasers as an Alternative to Formocresol and Sodium Hypochlorite for Pulpotomy Techniques in Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Fadhil WA; Noori AJ
    Cureus; 2024 Jul; 16(7):e65902. PubMed ID: 39219956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy on vital primary teeth: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Olatosi OO; Sote EO; Orenuga OO
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 25666010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of laser photobiomodulation pulpotomy in human primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial.
    Yavagal CM; Lal A; Chavan Patil VV; Yavagal PC; Neelakantappa KK; Hariharan M
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2021; 39(4):436-441. PubMed ID: 35102971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic evaluation of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary teeth.
    Odabaş ME; Bodur H; Bariş E; Demir C
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 17368330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation and Comparison between Formocresol and Sodium Hypochlorite as Pulpotomy Medicament: A Randomized Study.
    Chauhan SP; Gupta M; Ahmed H; Tongya R; Sharma D; Chugh B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Nov; 18(11):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 29109316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes for primary molars treated by different types of pulpotomy: A retrospective cohort study.
    Kuo HY; Lin JR; Huang WH; Chiang ML
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2018 Jan; 117(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 28325624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Moeintaghavi A; Emtiazi M; Hosseini G
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 18797098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of
    Kahvand M; Mehran M; Haghgoo R; Faghihi T
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2019; 9(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 31516873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Tricalcium Silicate and Formocresol Pulpotomies Followed for Two to Four Years.
    Rubanenko M; Petel R; Tickotsky N; Fayer I; Fuks AB; Moskovitz M
    Pediatr Dent; 2019 Nov; 41(6):446-450. PubMed ID: 31882030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars.
    Noorollahian H
    Br Dent J; 2008 Jun; 204(11):E20. PubMed ID: 18425074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomised controlled clinical trial comparing pure Portland cement and formocresol pulpotomies followed from 2 to 4 years.
    Petel R; Ziskind K; Bernfeld N; Suliman H; Fuks AB; Moskovitz M
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2021 Aug; 22(4):547-552. PubMed ID: 33175326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Nd:YAG laser pulpotomy on human primary molars.
    Liu JF
    J Endod; 2006 May; 32(5):404-7. PubMed ID: 16631836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow-up study.
    Ibricevic H; Al-Jame Q
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Mar; 4(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 12870985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of white MTA versus formocresol pulpotomy: A 48-month follow-up study.
    Biedma Perea M; Solano Mendoza B; Garcia-Godoy F; Mendoza Mendoza A; Iglesias-Linares A
    Am J Dent; 2017 Jun; 30(3):131-136. PubMed ID: 29178757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sodium hypochlorite versus Formocresol in primary molars pulpotomies: a randomized clinical trial.
    Al-Mutairi MA; Bawazir OA
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 14(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 23597217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.