These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32597283)

  • 1. Prediction of stone-free rates following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in a contemporary cohort of patients with stone densities exceeding 1000 HU.
    Azal Neto W; Reis LO; Pedro RN
    Scand J Urol; 2020 Aug; 54(4):344-348. PubMed ID: 32597283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.
    Ouzaid I; Al-qahtani S; Dominique S; Hupertan V; Fernandez P; Hermieu JF; Delmas V; Ravery V
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E438-42. PubMed ID: 22372937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of shockwave lithotripsy use for single medium sized hard renal stone with stone density ≥ 1000 HU. A prospective study.
    Elbaset MA; Taha DE; Anas M; Abouelkheir RT; Edwan M; Abdullateef M; Ashour R; Osman Y; Sheir KZ
    World J Urol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):243-250. PubMed ID: 34392391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
    Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
    J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Predictive Role of Abdominal Fat Parameters and Stone Density on SWL Outcomes.
    Kaya C; Kaynak Y; Karabag A; Aykaç A
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2020; 16(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 31989897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shock wave lithotripsy success for renal stones based on patient and stone computed tomography characteristics.
    Weld KJ; Montiglio C; Morris MS; Bush AC; Cespedes RD
    Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1043-6; discussion 1046-7. PubMed ID: 18158009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.
    Garg M; Johnson H; Lee SM; Rai BP; Somani B; Philip J
    Curr Urol Rep; 2023 Apr; 24(4):173-185. PubMed ID: 36802317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
    Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.
    Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using a three-dimensional computer assisted stone volume estimates to evaluate extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of kidney stones.
    Bigum LH; Ulriksen PS; Omar OS
    Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 26914829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kidney stone size and hounsfield units predict successful shockwave lithotripsy in children.
    El-Assmy A; El-Nahas AR; Abou-El-Ghar ME; Awad BA; Sheir KZ
    Urology; 2013 Apr; 81(4):880-4. PubMed ID: 23395121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.
    Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
    Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can we predict the ancillary treatments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal and upper ureteral stones?
    Ibrahim A; Elatreisy A; Khogeer A; Ahmadi A; Mishra S; Faisal M; Sabnis R; Aube-Peterkin M; Carrier S; Ganpule A; Desai M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Dec; 94(4):439-442. PubMed ID: 36576455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy.
    Patel T; Kozakowski K; Hruby G; Gupta M
    J Endourol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1383-5. PubMed ID: 19694526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy.
    Hameed DA; Elgammal MA; ElGanainy EO; Hageb A; Mohammed K; El-Taher AM; Mostafa MM; Ahmed AI
    Urolithiasis; 2013 Nov; 41(6):511-5. PubMed ID: 23907170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shockwave Lithotripsy Is an Efficacious Treatment Modality for Obese Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi: Logistic Regression and Matched-Pair Analyses from a Dedicated Center Comparing Treatment Outcomes by Skin-to-Stone Distance.
    Mains EAA; Blackmur JP; Sharma AD; Gietzmann WK; El-Mokadem I; Stephenson C; Wallace S; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
    J Endourol; 2020 Apr; 34(4):487-494. PubMed ID: 32030994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones in pediatric patients: a multivariate analysis model for estimating the stone-free probability.
    El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Awad BA; Elhalwagy SM; Elshal AM; Sheir KZ
    Int J Urol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1205-10. PubMed ID: 23441845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of electromagnetic extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on high-density ureteral stones.
    Bongrand B; Millet I; Autissier C; Faget C; Robert M
    Prog Urol; 2022 Jul; 32(8-9):608-615. PubMed ID: 35135703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The usefulness of the maximum Hounsfield units (HU) in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome for ureteral stones and the proposal of novel indicators using the maximum HU.
    Sugino Y; Kato T; Furuya S; Sasaki T; Arima K; Sugimura Y
    Urolithiasis; 2020 Feb; 48(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 30859262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treating moderate-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones.
    Chung VY; Turney BW
    Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 26743071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.