These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32597784)

  • 1. Effect of cervical margin relocation technique with composite resin on the marginal integrity of a ceramic onlay: a case report.
    Alhassan MA; Bajunaid SO
    Gen Dent; 2020; 68(4):e1-e3. PubMed ID: 32597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of cervical margin relocation (CMR) on periodontal health: 12-month results of a controlled trial.
    Ferrari M; Koken S; Grandini S; Ferrari Cagidiaco E; Joda T; Discepoli N
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():70-76. PubMed ID: 29061380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Deep Margin Elevation on CAD/CAM-Fabricated Ceramic Inlays.
    Vertolli TJ; Martinsen BD; Hanson CM; Howard RS; Kooistra S; Ye L
    Oper Dent; 2020 Nov; 45(6):608-617. PubMed ID: 32243253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defect-orientated onlay with cavity design optimization and cervical margin relocation: a case report.
    Elsayed A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb; 24(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 34006065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro.
    Roggendorf MJ; Krämer N; Dippold C; Vosen VE; Naumann M; Jablonski-Momeni A; Frankenberger R
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1068-73. PubMed ID: 22960537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of proximal box elevation technique on marginal integrity of adhesively luted Cerec inlays.
    Müller V; Friedl KH; Friedl K; Hahnel S; Handel G; Lang R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):607-612. PubMed ID: 27507168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of proximal box elevation on bond strength of composite inlays.
    Da Silva Gonçalves D; Cura M; Ceballos L; Fuentes MV
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):247-254. PubMed ID: 26969499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of Direct Restorative Materials in Proximal Box Elevation on the Margin Quality and Fracture Resistance of Molars Restored With CAD/CAM Onlays.
    Grubbs TD; Vargas M; Kolker J; Teixeira EC
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 31084532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of cervical margin relocation with direct restorative materials on the marginal integrity of CAD-CAM composite inlays.
    Pereira LFO; Perucelli F; Souza EM; Rached RN
    Am J Dent; 2022 Feb; 35(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 35316590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations.
    Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Hiller KA
    Dent Mater; 1995 May; 11(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 8600007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with subgingival cervical margins: new classification and differentiated treatment approach.
    Veneziani M
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2010; 5(1):50-76. PubMed ID: 20305873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10785294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
    Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
    Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays.
    Zaruba M; Göhring TN; Wegehaupt FJ; Attin T
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):317-24. PubMed ID: 23004362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.