These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32598180)

  • 1. Statistical Assessment of Depth Normalization for Small RNA Sequencing.
    Qin LX; Zou J; Shi J; Lee A; Mihailovic A; Farazi TA; Tuschl T; Singer S
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2020 Jun; 4():567-582. PubMed ID: 32598180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choice of library size normalization and statistical methods for differential gene expression analysis in balanced two-group comparisons for RNA-seq studies.
    Li X; Cooper NGF; O'Toole TE; Rouchka EC
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):75. PubMed ID: 31992223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PRECISION.seq: An R Package for Benchmarking Depth Normalization in microRNA Sequencing.
    Zou J; Düren Y; Qin LX
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():823431. PubMed ID: 35154266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of normalization methods in mammalian microRNA-Seq data.
    Garmire LX; Subramaniam S
    RNA; 2012 Jun; 18(6):1279-88. PubMed ID: 22532701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Depth normalization of small RNA sequencing: using data and biology to select a suitable method.
    Düren Y; Lederer J; Qin LX
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Jun; 50(10):e56. PubMed ID: 35188574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of per sample global scaling and per gene normalization methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data.
    Li X; Brock GN; Rouchka EC; Cooper NGF; Wu D; O'Toole TE; Gill RS; Eteleeb AM; O'Brien L; Rai SN
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176185. PubMed ID: 28459823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MicroRNA array normalization: an evaluation using a randomized dataset as the benchmark.
    Qin LX; Zhou Q
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e98879. PubMed ID: 24905456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Large-scale benchmarking reveals false discoveries and count transformation sensitivity in 16S rRNA gene amplicon data analysis methods used in microbiome studies.
    Thorsen J; Brejnrod A; Mortensen M; Rasmussen MA; Stokholm J; Al-Soud WA; Sørensen S; Bisgaard H; Waage J
    Microbiome; 2016 Nov; 4(1):62. PubMed ID: 27884206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of normalization methods on the performance of supervised learning algorithms applied to HTSeq-FPKM-UQ data sets: 7SK RNA expression as a predictor of survival in patients with colon adenocarcinoma.
    Shahriyari L
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 May; 20(3):985-994. PubMed ID: 29112707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance evaluation of transcriptomics data normalization for survival risk prediction.
    Ni A; Qin LX
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34245143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Empirical Evaluation of Normalization Methods for MicroRNA Arrays in a Liposarcoma Study.
    Qin LX; Tuschl T; Singer S
    Cancer Inform; 2013; 12():83-101. PubMed ID: 23589668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does normalization impact RNA-seq disease diagnosis?
    Han H; Men K
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Sep; 85():80-92. PubMed ID: 30041017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dex-Benchmark: datasets and code to evaluate algorithms for transcriptomics data analysis.
    Xie Z; Chen C; Ma'ayan A
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16351. PubMed ID: 37953774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normalization of RNA-seq data using factor analysis of control genes or samples.
    Risso D; Ngai J; Speed TP; Dudoit S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2014 Sep; 32(9):896-902. PubMed ID: 25150836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comprehensive processing of high-throughput small RNA sequencing data including quality checking, normalization, and differential expression analysis using the UEA sRNA Workbench.
    Beckers M; Mohorianu I; Stocks M; Applegate C; Dalmay T; Moulton V
    RNA; 2017 Jun; 23(6):823-835. PubMed ID: 28289155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SimBA: A methodology and tools for evaluating the performance of RNA-Seq bioinformatic pipelines.
    Audoux J; Salson M; Grosset CF; Beaumeunier S; Holder JM; Commes T; Philippe N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 18(1):428. PubMed ID: 28969586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recurrent functional misinterpretation of RNA-seq data caused by sample-specific gene length bias.
    Mandelboum S; Manber Z; Elroy-Stein O; Elkon R
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Nov; 17(11):e3000481. PubMed ID: 31714939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential Expression Analysis in RNA-Seq by a Naive Bayes Classifier with Local Normalization.
    Dou Y; Guo X; Yuan L; Holding DR; Zhang C
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():789516. PubMed ID: 26339642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expression analysis of RNA sequencing data from human neural and glial cell lines depends on technical replication and normalization methods.
    Knight VB; Serrano EE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 19(Suppl 14):412. PubMed ID: 30453873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls.
    Parikh H; Mohiyuddin M; Lam HY; Iyer H; Chen D; Pratt M; Bartha G; Spies N; Losert W; Zook JM; Salit M
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():64. PubMed ID: 26772178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.