These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32598359)

  • 21. Students' Response to the Questionnaire about the Usefulness of Concept Maps for Problem-Based Learning and the Forms of Concept Maps.
    Kang BJ; Kim SK
    Korean J Med Educ; 2009 Mar; 21(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 25812959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Begin the BEGAN (The Brown Educational Guide to the Analysis of Narrative) - a framework for enhancing educational impact of faculty feedback to students' reflective writing.
    Reis SP; Wald HS; Monroe AD; Borkan JM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Aug; 80(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 20056370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automated feedback and writing: a multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students' performance.
    Fleckenstein J; Liebenow LW; Meyer J
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1162454. PubMed ID: 37465061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating elementary-aged students' abilities to generalize and maintain fluency gains of a performance feedback writing intervention.
    Hier BO; Eckert TL
    Sch Psychol Q; 2014 Dec; 29(4):488-502. PubMed ID: 24708279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Unraveling the effects of rubrics and exemplars on student writing performance.
    Lipnevich AA; Panadero E; Calistro T
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Mar; 29(1):136-148. PubMed ID: 36174171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Subtypes of written expression in elementary school children: a linguistic-based model.
    Wakely MB; Hooper SR; de Kruif RE; Swartz C
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2006; 29(1):125-59. PubMed ID: 16390291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What are they thinking? Automated analysis of student writing about acid-base chemistry in introductory biology.
    Haudek KC; Prevost LB; Moscarella RA; Merrill J; Urban-Lurain M
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2012; 11(3):283-93. PubMed ID: 22949425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Development and Preliminary Validation of a Rubric to Assess Medical Students' Written Summary Statements in Virtual Patient Cases.
    Smith S; Kogan JR; Berman NB; Dell MS; Brock DM; Robins LS
    Acad Med; 2016 Jan; 91(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 26726864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. I will write about: Investigating multiword expressions in prospective students' argumentative writing.
    Nam D; Park K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0242843. PubMed ID: 33270693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Construct Validity of an Instrument for Assessment of Reflective Writing-Based Portfolios of Medical Students.
    Kassab SE; Bidmos M; Nomikos M; Daher-Nashif S; Kane T; Sarangi S; Abu-Hijleh M
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2020; 11():397-404. PubMed ID: 32581621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating the impact of feedback on elementary aged students' fluency growth in written expression: a randomized controlled trial.
    Truckenmiller AJ; Eckert TL; Codding RS; Petscher Y
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Dec; 52(6):531-48. PubMed ID: 25432270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Concept Mapping Activity to Enhance Pharmacy Students' Metacognition and Comprehension of Fundamental Disease State Knowledge.
    Powell BD; Oxley MS; Chen K; Anksorus H; Hubal R; Persky AM; Harris S
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2021 May; 85(5):8266. PubMed ID: 34283726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Practice of written feedback in nursing degree programmes in Karachi: the students' perspective.
    Khowaja AA; Gul RB; Lakhani A; Rizvi NF; Saleem F
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Apr; 24(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 24709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using Corpus Analyses to Help Address the DIF Interpretation: Gender Differences in Standardized Writing Assessment.
    Li Z; Chen MY; Banerjee J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1088. PubMed ID: 32581944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Students use of exemplars to support academic writing in higher education: An integrative review.
    Carter R; Salamonson Y; Ramjan LM; Halcomb E
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Jun; 65():87-93. PubMed ID: 29547812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A qualitative study on using concept maps in problem-based learning.
    Chan ZCY
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2017 May; 24():70-76. PubMed ID: 28414998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of a Near Peer Tutoring Program to Improve Medical Students' Note Writing Skills.
    Olvet DM; Wackett A; Crichlow S; Baldelli P
    Teach Learn Med; 2022; 34(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 32088996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Students' and teachers' views of written feedback at undergraduate level: a literature review.
    Agius NM; Wilkinson A
    Nurse Educ Today; 2014 Apr; 34(4):552-9. PubMed ID: 23931928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relations among motivation, behaviour, and performance in writing: A multiple-group structural equation modeling study.
    Camacho A; Alves RA; De Smedt F; Van Keer H; Boscolo P
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2021 Dec; 91(4):1456-1480. PubMed ID: 34096046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Programming generality into a performance feedback writing intervention: A randomized controlled trial.
    Hier BO; Eckert TL
    J Sch Psychol; 2016 Jun; 56():111-31. PubMed ID: 27268572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.