These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32599310)

  • 1. Dependencies in evidential reports: The case for informational advantages.
    Pilditch TD; Hahn U; Fenton N; Lagnado D
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104343. PubMed ID: 32599310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment.
    Crupi V; Elia F; Aprà F; Tentori K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):756-760. PubMed ID: 29978726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do smart people have better intuitions?
    Thompson VA; Pennycook G; Trippas D; Evans JSBT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jul; 147(7):945-961. PubMed ID: 29975089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strange but true: Corroboration and base rate neglect.
    Pilditch TD; Lagator S; Lagnado D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 31944808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity to Evidential Dependencies in Judgments Under Uncertainty.
    Xie B; Hayes B
    Cogn Sci; 2022 May; 46(5):e13144. PubMed ID: 35579865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The rational continued influence of misinformation.
    Connor Desai SA; Pilditch TD; Madsen JK
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104453. PubMed ID: 33011527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts.
    Shengelia T; Lagnado D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():519262. PubMed ID: 33613348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effect of Evidential Impact on Perceptual Probabilistic Judgments.
    Mangiarulo M; Pighin S; Polonio L; Tentori K
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jan; 45(1):e12919. PubMed ID: 33398915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beliefs and Bayesian reasoning.
    Cohen AL; Sidlowski S; Staub A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):972-978. PubMed ID: 27604495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditionals and the hierarchy of causal queries.
    Skovgaard-Olsen N; Stephan S; Waldmann MR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Dec; 150(12):2472-2505. PubMed ID: 34881947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reasoners consider alternative causes in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Aßfalg A; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2188-2208. PubMed ID: 30998074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judging the Probability of Hypotheses Versus the Impact of Evidence: Which Form of Inductive Inference Is More Accurate and Time-Consistent?
    Tentori K; Chater N; Crupi V
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):758-78. PubMed ID: 26100936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neglect of alternative causes in predictive but not diagnostic reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 21(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 20424064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic causal reasoning with verbal information.
    Meder B; Mayrhofer R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():54-84. PubMed ID: 28623726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probabilistic conditional reasoning: Disentangling form and content with the dual-source model.
    Singmann H; Klauer KC; Beller S
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Aug; 88():61-87. PubMed ID: 27416493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilities.
    Verheij B
    Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Oct; 12(4):1175-1199. PubMed ID: 31347261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fuzzy-trace theory: dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience.
    Brainerd CJ; Reyna VF
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2001; 28():41-100. PubMed ID: 11605365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facilitating normative judgments of conditional probability: frequency or nested sets?
    Yamagishi K
    Exp Psychol; 2003; 50(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 12693194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing cognitive biases in probabilistic reasoning by the use of logarithm formats.
    Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A; Lindskog M
    Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):248-67. PubMed ID: 21640337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are There Two Kinds of Reasoners?
    Markovits H
    J Intell; 2024 Feb; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 38535159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.