These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32599637)
21. Comment on "Open vs robotic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis on 1469 patients from the IMIGASTRIC prospective database". Graziosi L; Natalizi N; Donini A Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Oct; 408(1):407. PubMed ID: 37847381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Robot-assisted Mediastinal Mass Resection]. Eichhorn M; Haag J; Grünewald C; Reimer P; Winter H Zentralbl Chir; 2021 Feb; 146(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 32767302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis. Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robot-assisted gastrectomy and oesophagectomy for cancer. Falkenback D; Lehane CW; Lord RV ANZ J Surg; 2014 Oct; 84(10):712-21. PubMed ID: 24730691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robot-assisted Minimally-invasive Internal Fixation of Pelvic Ring Injuries: A Single-center Experience. Liu HS; Duan SJ; Xin FZ; Zhang Z; Wang XG; Liu SD Orthop Surg; 2019 Feb; 11(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 30714333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robot-assisted laparoscopic antegrade versus open inguinal lymphadenectomy: a retrospective controlled study. Yu H; Lu Y; Xiao Y; Guo J; Yin X; Yang Y; Wang H; Gao J BMC Urol; 2019 Dec; 19(1):135. PubMed ID: 31870347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Minimally invasive surgery for deep-infiltrating endometriosis and its impact on fertility: can robotic surgery play a role? Gianardi D; Giannini A J Robot Surg; 2019 Dec; 13(6):789-790. PubMed ID: 31161449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations. Caruso S; Patriti A; Roviello F; De Franco L; Franceschini F; Coratti A; Ceccarelli G World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jul; 22(25):5694-717. PubMed ID: 27433084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. van Hillegersberg R; Boone J; Draaisma WA; Broeders IA; Giezeman MJ; Borel Rinkes IH Surg Endosc; 2006 Sep; 20(9):1435-9. PubMed ID: 16703427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Grading evaluation of operative complications and analysis of related risk factors in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer treated by robotic-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery]. Guo RX; Du JM; Wang PR; Li BJ; Li LX; Wang Q; Bai J Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 55(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 32146740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Para-aortic lymph node surgical staging in locally-advanced cervical cancer: comparison between robotic versus conventional laparoscopy. Loverix L; Salihi RR; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Concin N; Han S; van Gorp T; Vergote I Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Apr; 30(4):466-472. PubMed ID: 32079714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Design of a new haptic device and experiments in minimally invasive surgical robot. Wang T; Pan B; Fu Y; Wang S; Ai Y Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2017 Dec; 22(sup1):240-250. PubMed ID: 29072504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]