161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32599658)
1. Evaluating mandibular symphysis bone density according to various skeletal patterns with CBCT.
Gousman J; Park JH; Chae JM
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Feb; 24(1):70-77. PubMed ID: 32599658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Retrospective CBCT Study of the Relationship between Mandibular Symphysis Bone Density and Mandibular Growth Direction.
Chae JM; Gousman J; Seo JW; Bay RC; Jue SS; Park JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020 Sep; 44(5):356-365. PubMed ID: 33181848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A CBCT Evaluation of Midpalatal Bone Density in Various Skeletal Patterns.
Chae JM; Rogowski L; Mandair S; Bay RC; Park JH
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Nov; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 34883821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis.
Chen H; Liu Z; Hu X; Wu B; Gu Y
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):238. PubMed ID: 33952217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandibular condyle bone density in adolescents with varying skeletal patterns evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography: A potential predictive tool.
Kim KJ; Park JH; Bay RC; Lee MY; Chang NY; Chae JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):382-389. PubMed ID: 30173841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Basal and dentoalveolar transverse parameters in different sagittal and vertical malocclusions in adults: a comparative study.
Abdulghani EA; Al-Sosowa AA; Alhashimi N; Cao B; Zheng W; Li Y; Alhammadi MS
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Apr; 28(5):276. PubMed ID: 38668916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thickness and height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships: A CBCT Study.
Casanova-Sarmiento JA; Arriola-Guillén LE; Ruíz-Mora GA; Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A
Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 31735681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of condylar size among different anteroposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.
Hasebe A; Yamaguchi T; Nakawaki T; Hikita Y; Katayama K; Maki K
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):306-311. PubMed ID: 30475648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional mandibular characteristics in skeletal malocclusion : A cross-sectional study.
Olbrisch C; Santander P; Moser N; Klenke D; Meyer-Marcotty P; Quast A
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Mar; 85(2):134-145. PubMed ID: 36018344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional evaluation of the cortical and cancellous bone density and thickness for miniscrew insertion: a CBCT study of interradicular area of adults with different facial growth pattern.
Hasani M; Afzoon S; Karandish M; Parastar M
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):753. PubMed ID: 37833666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitation of Mandibular Symphysis Bone as Source of Bone Grafting: Description in Class I and Class III Skeletal Conditions.
Velásquez H; Olate S; Díaz C; Navarro P; Borie E; de Moraes M
J Oral Implantol; 2017 Jun; 43(3):211-217. PubMed ID: 28650795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Associations between mandibular symphysis form and craniofacial structures.
Gómez Y; García-Sanz V; Zamora N; Tarazona B; Bellot-Arcís C; Langsjoen E; Paredes-Gallardo V
Oral Radiol; 2018 May; 34(2):161-171. PubMed ID: 30484128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Size of the Condyle in Vertical and Anteroposterior Skeletal Conditions with the Help of Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Jyotirmay ; Singh SK; Adarsh K; Sinha A; Kumar A; Sharan S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 34257181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of condylar cortical bone thickness in patient groups with different vertical facial dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography.
Lo Giudice A; Rustico L; Caprioglio A; Migliorati M; Nucera R
Odontology; 2020 Oct; 108(4):669-675. PubMed ID: 32236830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Chin Thickness in Adult Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns: a Cephalometric Study.
Patil HS; Golwalkar S; Chougule K; Kulkarni NR
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2021 Feb; 63(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 33650399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of hard and soft tissue thickness at mandibular symphysis in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical patterns.
Oh J; Ham LK; Shin H; Han SH; Kim Y
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38953566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method.
Dong Q; Shi H; Jia Q; Tian Y; Zhi K; Zhang L
Scanning; 2021; 2021():9996857. PubMed ID: 34040691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative analysis of the maxilla and the mandible in hyper- and hypodivergent skeletal Class II pattern.
Nair R; Deguchi TS; Li X; Katashiba S; Chan YH
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19154269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Musculomandibular morphology in individuals with different vertical skeletal growth patterns: an MRI and cone beam computed tomography study.
Gardovska K; Urtane I; Krumina G
Stomatologija; 2020; 22(4):99-106. PubMed ID: 33847281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of three-dimensional reconstructed palatal morphology in skeletal class III subjects with different vertical patterns using cone beam computed tomography.
Huang X; Huang W; Pei T; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Gu Y; Bai X
Head Face Med; 2024 Jan; 20(1):8. PubMed ID: 38281028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
